• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s an odd one.

    If a game cannot be sold cheaper elsewhere, publishers have two options, lower the price on Steam (which benefits consumers) or increase the price on the other platform(s) (which benefits the publisher).

    It benefits Valve no matter what. It can also benefit the consumer. It can also harm the consumer.

    Publishers have every right to not use Steam. Ubisoft had success with UPlay in the past, they just wanted even more money, so went back to Steam.

    Will be interesting to see what happens with the lawsuit.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Ubisoft had success with UPlay in the past

      What?

      The whole case is about Valve forcing other storefronts to sell at the same price as these publishers sell in Steam. Key point is that allegedly Valve requires this even if the game is sold not with a Steam key, but publishers own. Allegedly. Time will tell if they actually do it or not.

      So far Ubisoft and WB hasnt had a great reputation in gaming community, so there should be no surprises why most gamers side with Valve.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Of course. Ubisoft sold their games on UPlay and not Steam for a while. People still played their games and they had some big releases.

        Did they sell the games any cheaper? Of course they didnt.