UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agoRule Breakerpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square73linkfedilinkarrow-up1560arrow-down19
arrow-up1551arrow-down1imageRule Breakerpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square73linkfedilink
minus-squarer1veRRR@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·2 months agoNever ever have I seen it used in that manner. It’s always used as a thought terminating cliche suggesting that any comparison requires two things to be equal.
minus-squareandho@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoThat’s the implication, but saying it doesn’t make it true. It’s up to you to decide if it’s a valid point.
Never ever have I seen it used in that manner. It’s always used as a thought terminating cliche suggesting that any comparison requires two things to be equal.
That’s the implication, but saying it doesn’t make it true. It’s up to you to decide if it’s a valid point.