ALostInquirer@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 24 days agoWhat's a giveaway or tell that someone may be too online?message-squaremessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1120arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1111arrow-down1message-squareWhat's a giveaway or tell that someone may be too online?ALostInquirer@lemm.ee to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world · 24 days agomessage-square75fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareRobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·24 days agoIt works on the web interface.
minus-squarestonerboner@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·24 days agoI never said it didn’t 😆
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 days ago“attempts” implies that they couldn’t
minus-squarestonerboner@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·23 days agoI can attempt something and succeed. Or I can attempt something and fail. Attempt does not imply it didn’t work
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-223 days agoWhile true, I think it’s because in that sentence it was unnecessary so its inclusion gives the reader the idea the “attempt” part is relevant. Idk, language is weird, but I’m not the only one who read it that way.
It works on the web interface.
It also works in sync
I never said it didn’t 😆
“attempts” implies that they couldn’t
I can attempt something and succeed. Or I can attempt something and fail. Attempt does not imply it didn’t work
While true, I think it’s because in that sentence it was unnecessary so its inclusion gives the reader the idea the “attempt” part is relevant. Idk, language is weird, but I’m not the only one who read it that way.