(Bonus update) I’m back on KDE6 and it’s actually working! I ran Cinnamon for about a day before missing KDE and tried a fresh install of EndeavourOS. It worked fine, Wayland still doesn’t work but I’m only getting minor bugs with x11 compared to when I tried to update from 5.27

(Update) Well finally back on my desktop but sadly not on my original install, Thanks for all the help and advice! Sadly every path just sent me into another brick wall, I’m starting to think my drive itself is physically failing as I couldn’t mount it in chroot and even had trouble reformatting it…I’ll keep an eye on it and not save anything important to it.

I’ve decided I’m just not cut out for vanilla Arch just yet and gone back to Endeavour but this time with Cinnamon (for now) Thanks again!

After upgrading to KDE 6 and experiencing too many bugs for it to be useable for me I went back to a snapshot I made right before upgrading.

Now I’ve spent half my Friday tracking down different systemctl errors and trying to fix corrupted conf files from live USB environments, physically unplugged all but my nvme boot drive.

Rn I’m in a situation where I’m getting

[FAILED] Failed to mount /boot. See ‘systemctl status boot.mount’ for details [DEPEND] Dependency failed for Local File System.

Then it’s asking to give root password or press control-D, which I’ve dealt with before but this time my keyboard just doesn’t work

I tried to just sort it myself reading the Arch Wiki before begging for help on forums but I’m kinda at my wits end, This is a pretty new Arch installed and the first time using btfs on my main drive, I last updated maybe 4 days ago before today. I’ve also successfully restored from timeshift snapshots on this install before without issues.

Any help where to go from here would be great, thanks in advance.

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    0·
    8 months ago

    So you rolled back your root filesystem’s system state to a snapshot but did you roll back the kernel you’re booting into aswell?

    If you didn’t, that’d explain the symptoms seen here; you might be booting into a newer kernel than the system state has modules for. Without the appropriate kernel modules, Linux cannot mount filesystems or accept keyboard input. (This depends on which modules are required by the HW and whether they’re built into the kernel or copied to the initrd though.)

    For debugging, simply boot a live ISO and chroot into the system. The Arch Wiki has a page for that. You should be able to look at the journal inside the chroot and it’ll tell you exactly what’s wrong.

    • HouseWolf@lemm.eeOPEnglish
      0·
      8 months ago

      I rolled back using timeshift, which I have used many times before without issue.

      I’m not sure it that also rolls back the kernal but I seem to recall it typically does? I can be mistaken.

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        0·
        8 months ago

        That fully depends on where your kernels are stored. If they’re in a separate partition, then no; it won’t roll back with the rest of your system.

            • losttourist@kbin.social
              1·
              8 months ago

              Linux doesn’t really know about drives, it knows about partitions and mount points.

              Obviously this is a simplification, but in general it’s close enough. It also could well be your problem - timeshift doesn’t know or care that /boot is on the same physical drive as the rest of your system: if it’s a different partition, it’s separate.

            • Atemu@lemmy.ml
              1·
              8 months ago

              That doesn’t matter. Snapshots only concern the state of any one filesystem; they do not address separate filesystems in any way.

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    0·
    8 months ago

    6.7 kernel on btrfs is a shitshow, could be that here too. (btrfs subvolume corruption)

    • HouseWolf@lemm.eeOPEnglish
      0·
      8 months ago

      I’ve gone back to using EXT4 for now

      I only used BTFS for the first time on that install to try it out.

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        0·
        8 months ago

        You were super unlucky then, had you installed Endeavor with the same settings, it could have crashed the exact same way.

        The difference between Archinstall installed Arch & EndeavorOS is very minimal and overrated. In this case I think the fix would have been picking the LTS kernel until 6.8 is released.

        • HouseWolf@lemm.eeOPEnglish
          0·
          8 months ago

          Luckily I keep all my important files and backups on a separate drive so reinstalling an OS is only a “mild” annoyance for me.

          I was only on Arch for abit over a week just to “prove I could” but honestly didn’t see a huge upgrade over Endeavour for my personal use.

          • Sina@beehaw.org
            1·
            8 months ago

            I was only on Arch for abit over a week just to “prove I could” but honestly didn’t see a huge upgrade over Endeavour for my personal use.

            Arch, Endeavour is one and the same. So of course you wouldn’t see anything.