As the title states I am confused on this matter. The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

I really don’t get the logic. As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Please don’t come at me with pro-Israeli rhetoric as this isn’t the post for that, I’m asking about why people would make such choices and I’m not up for debate on the Middle East, on this post, you can DM me for that.

Edit: Bedtime here now so will respond to incoming comments in the morning, love starting the day with an inbox full 😊.

Edit 2: This blew up, it’s a little overwhelming right now but I do intent on replying to everybody that took the time to comment. Just need to get in the right headspace.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      29 days ago

      We get drug spam and stock spam, no reason to expect that political spam is any less likely.

      Lemmy has a huge amount of hardcore lefty’s. If you can get them to not vote, and especially if you can get them to tell their friends not to vote, that is a big win.

      Astroturfing/sockpuppeting is dirty cheap to do, so no reason not to try.

      You do see some users here that will post continously on about a certain topic repeatedly, with no other opinions. They might be legit, but I have my suspicions.

      • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        29 days ago

        “Hardcore lefties” have a very different understanding of the value of their vote, which is to say, it means very little.

        Have you deigned to ask them questions?

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      29 days ago

      I disagree - it feels like Lemmy is seeing the same kind of shills that 4chan saw in the last several elections. These bad actors are trying to sway dems to vote third party or not vote at all “in protest” across many small and large online spaces.

          • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            29 days ago

            Interesting. What am I shilling for? What are my real opinions? What are the fake ones I’m presenting?

            • davel@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              25
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              edit-2
              29 days ago

              Your real opinions are the ones I like, and your fake opinions are the ones I don’t. It’s not rocket surgery.

            • davidgro@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              28 days ago

              Obviously a huge genocide isn’t enough for you - you clearly want Every Palestinian to be killed or imprisoned when Trump is elected. And not just the ones in Gaza, if I were a Palestinian in the US, I’d be terrified of that madman winning, and I’d do everything I could to support Harris like my life depended on it (because it very well might)

              More generally you are trying to convince us that the genocide is the only important issue in the world, and that it’s somehow worth not supporting someone who is in all ways (not just all other) the far better of the two electable candidates.

              • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                10
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                28 days ago

                Obviously a huge genocide isn’t enough for you - you clearly want Every Palestinian to be killed or imprisoned when Trump is elected.

                Please do your best to act in good faith and not lie about me.

                And not just the ones in Gaza, if I were a Palestinian in the US, I’d be terrified of that madman winning, and I’d do everything I could to support Harris like my life depended on it (because it very well might)

                No, that is what you, a non-Palestinian, believe you get to decide for Palestinians, people who have lost half or more of their family in the last year. The Palestinian diaspira, generally speaking, rejects Biden and Harris.

                However, you have not answered my questions.

                More generally you are trying to convince us that the genocide is the only important issue in the world, and that it’s somehow worth not supporting someone who is in all ways (not just all other) the far better of the two electable candidates.

                Now you are downplaying the magnitude of genocide. Never again means never again for anyone, not just when it is politically convenient for you.

                Welp, looks like you didn’t answer my questions. Maybe next time, right?

                • davidgro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  To be lies or even bad faith, I’d have to not actually believe what I wrote. And I very much believe what I wrote.

                  The Palestinian diaspira [sic], generally speaking, rejects Biden and Harris.

                  Do they now? (A small sample. Some of those are about the ones still in Gaza, but I don’t think that detracts from the point.)

                  However, you have not answered my questions.

                  Fine. Here are your questions and my genuine answers.

                  What am I shilling for?

                  I think you are likely a shill for Donald Trump. I don’t assume it’s directly, as in I don’t assume you are being paid by the GOP or a super PAC, but wouldn’t be surprised if someone was paying you.

                  What are my real opinions?

                  Hard to say. At best (unlikely) I think you have been very strongly misled into thinking that’s somehow what’s best for the country, or even the world. Otherwise I think you know fully what you are doing and the damage it may cause and you are fine with that. This is what I believe based on the comments I’ve seen from you.

                  What are the fake ones I’m presenting?

                  That you care about the genocide. I think you are using it as a wedge to try to divide and mute the Democrat vote.

                  Now you are downplaying the magnitude of genocide.

                  Not at all. That was the first thing I addressed: if Harris loses it will be so much worse in Gaza and elsewhere.

                  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    28 days ago

                    To be lies or even bad faith, I’d have to not actually believe what I wrote. And I very much believe what I wrote.

                    Given that you simply made up some bullshit, telling me that you actually really believe it would mean you have basically no grasp on reality. You can’t tell the difference between your imagination and what’s real, allegedly.

                    Personally, I think you do know the difference.

                    Do

                    A handful of somewhat misleadingly presented quotes from people selected through an unstated process. Literally no context for who most of them are. Many if the quotes have little to do with what you are talkjng about. And then a series of unsourced narratives about what people are thinking.

                    This is an incoherent read that follows a particular propaganda style but mostly comes across as incompetent.

                    they

                    “An informal canvasing in Gaza”.

                    This follows the same style but by a more competent writer. It is timed for the “honeymoon” period PR push for Harris.

                    now?

                    Democrats organized a letter from a handful of people, some of which were Pslestinian Americans. Amazing. The article does not even link the letter. Here is the link. Note that they included “Progressive Democrats” and “Community Leaders”. Perhaps you are unfamiliar with tokenizing PR strategies. If you look into the signatories, you will find an array of Democratic Party functionaries either working for the Party itself, an elected official of the party, or someone at the top of a Democratic Party - associated NGO. Far from a representation of community, this is the usual suspects in a PR push from party formations. They do this for all kinds of things.

                    It is like this is your first time learning about journalism and PR.

                    I think you are likely a shill for Donald Trump. I don’t assume it’s directly, as in I don’t assume you are being paid by the GOP or a super PAC, but wouldn’t be surprised if someone was paying you.

                    Ahahahahahaha

                    Hard to say.

                    Then by definition I am not a shill.

                    That you care about the genocide. I think you are using it as a wedge to try to divide and mute the Democrat vote.

                    I work against the genocide and have for over a year, doing organizing work. Folks like yourself have been excysing and normalizing genocide because your team is doing it.

                    So, wrong on all counts. Damn, did you know that words mean things and pulling things out of your as isn’t knowledge?

                    Not at all. That was the first thing I addressed: if Harris loses it will be so much worse in Gaza and elsewhere.

                    You did literally diwnplay the genocide, trying to say it is just one issue among many and that I’m being silly to make such a big deal out of it.

                    Begone, liar for genocide.

              • Count042@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                28 days ago

                It’s literally the worst crime in the world.

                Davidgro out here trying to minimize the literal worst crime in the world for political reasons.

                • davidgro@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  28 days ago

                  I agree. Genocide is the worst crime in the world.

                  Which is why I voted for Kamala Harris, to help keep Donald Trump from winning.

                  Do you disagree with my choice? If so, how would you vote in the US presidential election of 2024 to minimize the genocide in Gaza?

                  • Count042@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    27 days ago

                    Genocide is currently happening with the full support and speed of the US government.

                    Without resorting to platitudes, or general statements, what specific actions do you think Biden is taking to limit things?

                    Without resorting to platitudes, or general statements, what specific actions do you think Trump will take that will worsen the already existing systemic rape, torture, and murder of the Palestinian people?

                    There is no harm minimization for genocide.

                    People that believe there is have forgotten all historical lessons.

                    Please read this Nazi Era poem and consider its meaning:

                    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—
                         Because I was not a socialist.
                    
                    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—
                         Because I was not a trade unionist.
                    
                    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
                         Because I was not a Jew.
                    
                    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
                    

                    Those who make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. The absurdity here is believing someone willing to commit genocide against others will protect whatever out group you want to protect that you believe (probably accurately) Trump will go after.

                    The battle against fascism has already been lost. There is no reform possible from within to fix it.

    • davel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It is not currently such a place. I’ve yet to hear a Lemmy admin say otherwise.

      Edit to add: Russiagate conspiracy theorists want it to be true so they can simply dismiss voices that contradict their beliefs.