• Shortstack@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    My first instinct was to call this a repost as I remember seeing this like 4 years ago on reddit but this is a different platform altogether.

    Though it Is worth the reminder to Treat yo self

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Should you even call something out as a repost when the last time it was posted was 4 years ago?

      After all, millions of people have been born and grown up during that time

      • Shortstack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I mean yeah that’s true.

        But on reddit reposts were everywhere and it was very common for bots to karma farm by doing so, so calling it out had a purpose.

        • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          People who have already seen something know they’ve seen it. They can just skip it. To somebody else it will be new. The vast majority of items being called reposts on reddit were things I had never seen. Whining about reposts might give someone a false sense of accomplishment, but I found it to be useless noise.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            2 months ago

            One feature I feel like I want to see eventually is a list of links to reposts attached at the top of the post, so if someone reposts the same thing, or topic, or question, then if another person recognizes it and finds a previous link, the link could be added to the list and anyone who wants to see the “extended universe” of comments can browse them. That way discussion’s larger context is far more easy to see, and quality answers for example can be more easily found by anyone browsing after the link has been found.

            I’m not sure if it would be if genuine utility, but people are already doing the work of finding these links to the past, I feel like we might as well make it official and make it a feature?

            I’m curious what the rest of you think.

            • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah, I think this is a great idea. An automatic implementation would be easy if it’s a repeat of a that was already posted. Somewhat more difficult if it’s the same news but from a different source - dunno if that’s even technically a repost but it kind of is.

              • Comment105@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                A more loosely defined “related/variation” list of links might get very big, but I don’t feel like it absolutely shouldn’t be done. I don’t know, maybe.

                Might be able to add a second set to expand the feature if the repost list is successful and useful.

            • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s not a terrible idea - it would be a link to the existing discussion of the topic, which is informative. I like that better than people just whining RePoSt!!1!

      • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        My thoughts exactly. On reddit I used to reply to repost complaints, which I find annoying, by saying that they were the most reposted thing I saw. But tbh their frequency has seemed to decrease, almost as if they’re being auto-removed. If so, I appreciate it. A subject showing up repeatedly just means somebody’s still interested in it.