smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down10
arrow-up13arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square19fedilink
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 years agoWe cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
minus-squareSlopppyEngineer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoThere are now three competing standards. https://xkcd.com/927/
minus-squareTattorack@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoYes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
minus-squarebaropithecus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·2 years agoI know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
minus-squarepewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years ago#switchtodisplayport
minus-squareThunderbird4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 years agoI’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…
We cannot have two standards, that’s ridiculous! We need to develop one universal standard that covers everyone’s use cases.
There are now three competing standards.
https://xkcd.com/927/
Yes, I agree. And it needs to be open bloody source!!
I know what you are referencing, but displayport already covers everybody’s use cases
#switchtodisplayport
Oh? Let me CEC on that…
I’ll just pull it up on this display that’s more than 9 feet away from the source…