• theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    No one is learning any language using shitty Duolingo all they are learning is how to parrot useless phrases and vocab with no explanation on how to form sentences or actually use the language properly for themselves.

    • misk@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Isn’t Mandarin grammar super easy? It is relatively easy to speak, definitely less so to read/write.

        • misk@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          32 minutes ago

          I don’t speak Mandarin so I just share what I’ve heard from a friend who does. Supposedly there are very little rules to explain and other than writing system and how exotic it is, it’s one of the easier languages to learn. All of this sounds perfect for Duolingo. Obviously once you get the basics there’s no other way than immersing yourself in a language but that first hurdle should be easier to overcome.

    • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      All this hatred for a tool that is bridging the gap between not speaking a language and being able to understand basic sentences.

      • hansolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        37 minutes ago

        I speak 4 languages, and when I need surface level basics for a trip, I’ve found the Duolingo helps get the wrote memory part of see a shape, hear a sound.

        For actual terminology or grammar, it’s OK, but it doesn’t deserve the hype it gives itself. I can make up my own lessons with Google Translate better than Duolingo.

      • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Except for the fact that it is designed to keep you coming back and hopefully paying them for the privaledge whilst making people believe they are learning something useful.

        It is in fact counter productive to actually learning a language properly. I used it for a year and a half trying to learn Spanish and in that time I never really learnt anything of worth. On top of that my native Spanish speaking girlfriend told me on numerous occasions that the things it was “teaching” me were flat out incorrect.

        I learnt more useful language skills in a month on Busuu than I did in a year and a half using Duolingo. So yes there is a lot of hate because it wasted a lot of my time for absolutely zero benefit and in some cases taught me the wrong things so I had to go back and “unlearn” all the bullshit it constantly pushed to me.

        It isn’t a tool to bridge a gap, it is a word game designed to get you addicted to “streaks” and then hopefully remove money from your wallet under the guise of teaching you something.

        People that seriously want to learn a language should be dissuaded from using this trash app as it is only counter productive to the learning process, they should instead check out Busuu or listen to Language Transfer which is free and vastly superior!

        • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I see what you mean, but I don’t think anybody should expect Duolingo, atleast in the early stages, to teach conversation. The streaks are just a way to keep people engaged. That’s the biggest issue in education, which is keeping people engaged even during the tough parts.

          I do agree though. I use Duo as a method of practice side-by-side learning in an actual language school. My personal opinion is that nothing good ever comes of a single source. I always keep looking for different sources of information.

          I also see how this might not be how other people function, so I don’t really see any reason to object to your point.

          TL;DR - Fair enough. To each their own. Nothing is ever perfect and I agree that you shouldn’t charge money for something that isn’t “correct”. But for the most part, it isn’t worthy of hate as much as just distaste? Maybe there’s a better word for it.

          • mPony@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I used Duolingo for a while (for French and Spanish) but it didn’t allow for progress at the rate that I wanted to go. Then I realized that it was holding me back by design, to keep me using the app regularly. I know people who have done well with it, but it wasn’t a good fit for me.

          • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I am admittedly salty about my own experience with it which definitely skews me towards the negative view of it, I just dont like to see people jumping on that app and thinking that that alone will see them through learning a language.

            I do see your points of using it as a supplement to learning through other methods but also due to the fact that it taught me a few different things that were flat out wrong I just think that there are better supplementary learning resources.

            Also personally I really struggle with languages and wasting so much time on that app really destroyed my motivation for learning the language in general and as such my initial momentum has gone and I haven’t really progressed at all recently. Engagement is important like you say and I dont think the streaks are a bad idea but the way they implement them is insidious in that it is all tailored to keep you in app and hopefully paying them IMO.

            My initial message was more in disgust of the app as a whole, I wouldn’t go as far as to say I expressed hate otherwise I’d have used much stronger language but again everyone’s opinion on that line will be different. I just dont think it is good at all and if I can dissuade people from using it then I will. Maybe I should have put the alternatives I mentioned in the first comment to balance out the message but it is too late now :D

        • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I found language transfer very weird as you start with way too much english and I guess you need to jump at least 4 hours to learn interesting things

          • theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I kind of see what you mean but for me I really liked it as I am not very good at languages at all, maths and science makes more sense to my brain.

            I appreciated that they went through and made links with the English language based on the common root that they shared be it Latin or whatever. For me this helped me a lot to understand what was going on in the background of the language and how I could relate it to what I already know.

            Everyone learns differently and so will find different methods effecrive. Duolingo was a lot better when it first came about but now it is all about getting people trapped in a loop of feeling like they are learning something when they aren’t so they can maintain subscribers.

    • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      And it’s so fucking slow. Like yeah I remember the word for man and woman please stop asking me to click on it especially with the image next to it…

      • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Its called spaced repetition. Its helpful for people to remember something over repeated learning.

        If you find it too easy, you can choose to jump ahead or find better alternatives.

        • VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I know spaced repetition, but it’s too much repetition and not enough space. The jump ahead feature is bad because you just do the quiz twice until you success then you jumped without knowing previous stuff and you’re stuck with once again slow minded repetition just that it’s now a more “advanced” vocabulary

          • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Fair enough. I have benefited from Duolingo as a practice tool. But I do see Duo being tedious for people who truly wish to progress faster.

    • kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      i tried learning spanish with it, now i know how to order a hamburger with cheese but it won’t teach me much else… just the same fucking sentence over and over again. every now and then it drops in a new word and then we’re back to the hamburger thing.