crossposted from irc

    • jdeath@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      wow, nano is usually everyone’s first editor and them moving on to Vim. interesting to invert that. what do you like about nano?

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That depends a lot on when they started.

        When I first installed a distribution where the base system only came with nano instead of standard editors, I was very confused (and very disappointed that this whas what they’d come up with as a “friendly” interface).

        • jdeath@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          16 hours ago

          well, like the parent of my comment said, nano is a lot easier to use than vim or emacs. nano is much more like DOS edit or stuff like that. there are many memes about not being able to quit Vim, etc

      • Doomsider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Ease of use. When it comes to coding I prefer a GUI as well.

        I used Vim when I first installed Linux. It was painful but I used it. I found Nano and I stopped using Vim. No comparison in usability.

        • jdeath@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          16 hours ago

          yeah Vim takes a lot of effort to learn. Like any advanced tool. I will 100% always fire up nano when in a hurry. but i like trying to learn Vim as an exercise (in torture? idk haha)

    • AnAustralianPhotographer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The main things i learnt from vim are Escape :q and ^Z. Not a dig on vim, but it was quite a learning curve at the time when nano has been good enough for just about everything i do day to day.