• onion@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    No it’s ambiguous, you claiming there is one right answer is actually wrong.

      • Primarily0617@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re taking something you learned when you were like 9 years old and assuming it’s correct in every situation forever.

        Unfortunately this isn’t the case and you’re incorrect.

        • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Inaccurate, this has nothing to do with the mnemonic PEMDAS, this has to do with the actual order of operations it tries to instill. That order of operations is not ambiguous, there is a correct way to solve simple equations like the one above, and there is one and only one correct answer to it. That answer is 16.

          • Primarily0617@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            And in the “actual” order of operations, if we want to pretend one exists, 2( binds more tightly than ÷

            if you’re going via prescriptivism, then you’re wrong, because there are plenty of authoritative sources following the left hand model

            if you’re going via descriptivism, then you’re wrong, because this thread exists

            • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, 2( does not bind more tightly than ÷. 2( is simply 2×(…, and ÷ and × occur at the same level of priority. After resolving the addition in the parentheses, the remaining operations are resolved left to right.

              • Primarily0617@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                if you’re going via prescriptivism, then you’re wrong, because there are plenty of authoritative sources following the left hand model

                if you’re going via descriptivism, then you’re wrong, because this thread exists

                • LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No, the fact that a good many people are incorrect about how math works does not entail that math is an open question. It’s not, math has actual rules to its equations and an unambiguous right answer. In this case, that answer is 16.

                  • Primarily0617@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    math has actual rules to its equations and an unambiguous right answer

                    you know you could’ve just started this by admitting you’ve never touched the subject at a higher level than high school and saved us all this bother