• MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What is genuine political discussion? How do you moderate it? Who is going to come when it’s moderated? How do you deal with both legitimate and legitimate complaints about biased moderation?

    I just don’t think it’s a thing on social media. I think it can happen in private conversations, but as soon as it becomes more about winning an argument or posturing for readers, I think any hope of earnest discourse is lost. The more public a conversation, the worse it is. It’s like trying to argue with a bully in front of their friends. You might be able to reach the humanity in them, but not in that moment.

    • FishFace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It used to be, in the early days of mass social media (and it was widespread on forums)

      Moderation isn’t easy but it also needn’t be fraught - set standards of civility (strict or loose) and basic rules about hate speech, and let people take themselves out of discussions that are within the rules that they nevertheless don’t like.

      It works a lot better in small communities where you talk to the same people - you can ignore people you don’t like and not have the same conversation over and over.