Jaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agoAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square284fedilinkarrow-up1984arrow-down120cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1964arrow-down1external-linkAI agents wrong ~70% of time: Carnegie Mellon studywww.theregister.comJaden Norman@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 24 days agomessage-square284fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ml
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-223 days agoand? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
minus-squareTja@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoThe 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
minus-squareTimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·22 days agoyou’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
Neither can we…
and? we can understand 256 where AI can’t, that’s the point.
The 256 thing was written by a person. AI doesn’t have exclusive rights to being dumb, plenty of dumb people around.
you’re right, the dumb of AI is completely comparable to the dumb of human, there’s no difference worth talking about, sorry i even spoke the fuck up
No worries.