• sga@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    that could be the case. but what I have seen my younger peers do is use these llms to “read” the papers, and only use it’s summaries as the source. In that case, it is definitely not good.

      • sga@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        you would find more and more of it these days. people who are not good in the language, or not in subject both would use it.

        • fullsquare@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          if someone is so bad at a subject that chatgpt offers actual help, then maybe that person shouldn’t write an article on that subject in the first place. the only language chatgpt speaks is bland nonconfrontational corporate sludge, i’m not sure how it helps