• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    15 hours ago

    These kind of changes will go a long way towards making it more accessible for the less technically inclined. Glad to see some actual progress in that direction, instead of the standard ‘got good’ style of Linux gatekeeping.

      • excess0680@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        21 hours ago

        This is probably a hot take, but:

        I disagree. The OS doesn’t run a mainline kernel, and the Raspberry Pi devs recommend a clean slate on OS upgrades. Granted, they do some trickery for performance with their Zero (not 2) line, using armhf instead of the slower armel, but this doesn’t excuse the fact that Raspberry Pi OS is so brittle. The builds are also still on 32-bit, even though every Pi since 3B can run 64-bit OSes.

        I just run Debian on mine. Can’t be assed to clean flash my devices each major update.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I kinda understood half of the things you said, but i run DietPi on mine.

          It has 64-bit support, you can update the os without resetting everything, still based on the original kernels for the closed source optimizations, but removes all the clunky and slow parts, leaving a very lightweight and fast os.

          Plus, for newbies (like me) it has a decent built-in installer for various software with minimal ulterior setup required.

          • excess0680@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            35 minutes ago

            It sounds like you’ve found your ideal distro. Great! Not everyone will have the same exact use case for their Pi’s.

            I’m just a little disgruntled because I like treating my Pi’s as headless servers, often with a single purpose, and I don’t want to have to erase the SD cards to upgrade versions.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          16 hours ago

          The SOC also isn’t fully open, so you won’t get top tier performance with a purely FOSS stack. I push the limits on mine (Retropie mostly), so using their OS is the better bet (I use the one shipped by Retropie, which is super old).

          I actually kinda hate the Raspberry Pi because of how closed it is. It’s gotten a bit better over the years, but the Pi 5 took a big step back. But unfortunately, its competitors aren’t much better, so I still use my RPis, but I probably won’t buy more.

          I’m also not a fan of Debian in general, so if I switched, I would probably use openSUSE or Arch instead (I tried Arch, but it had issues syncing to disk after updates; they fixed that, but it shows that other distros will be a bit wonky). Raspbian works, so I stick with it.

          • excess0680@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            That’s very fair. Everyone has a different use for Pi’s, and I just happen to favor long-lived devices that can be updated easily. I wish more of the pi internals were upstreamed too.

        • confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          My frustration with Raspberry Pi OS is that the packages available were constantly out of date. Some were 2 to 3 years out of date.

          I eventually started using Alpine linux on my Pi boards and have been happy since then. Now I can use the latest Docker and Podman packages without manually adding new repositories.

          If I didn’t prefer Alpine’s minimal approach, I would have probably gone with Debian because of it’s history in stability.

          • excess0680@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I believe you may have found your ideal OS. Debian will always lag behind ever so often. And that’s okay. We all use the Pi’s for different reasons.

            • confusedpuppy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 hours ago

              I can appreciate that about Debian. Common tools and stability can be both convinient and reliable. Learning linux is already overwhelming with choices.

              Even though I use Alpine for all my Pi boards and laptop, I keep a live usb partition of Linux Mint Debian Edition as my emergency backup. It just works.

              • SayCyberOnceMore@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I went with Arch Linux on ARM for a minimal approach - did you try that?

                Genuninely interested in your experience of Alpine Linux as I’d not considered it on a Pi (only VMs so far…)

    • bigredgiraffe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I do on some of mine because it makes some of the automation i have for them simpler to maintain when it is also applied to x86 hardware or virtual machines. It used to be a huge pain to use on a pi but it works pretty well these days, especially since about 24.04 I want to say.