Dawnswap is a decentralized open-source non-custodial peer-to-peer exchange platform built with Monero and Tor at its core. It is based on the existing open-source codebase of the Haveno project which aims to support the rapidly growing Monero community and crypto in general all over the world. Making it easier for everyone to trade crypto and fiat currencies without middlemen and trusting third parties. Dawn will focus on improving the user experience while maintaining the core principles of decentralization, anonymity and autonomy. The project will leverage the existing open-source codebase of Haveno and introduce several new features and improvements to better serve the needs of its users.
A message from Dawnswap team
" We envision a society free from censorship, corporate overreach, and government control, where technology serves all equally. Decentralization is not just an idea, it is an ideal to be actively pursued. Our mission is to give back control to the individual, starting with financial sovereignty. "
Characteristics of the Dawnswap network
- Crypto currencies: XMR, USDT, USDC, ETH, BTC, LTC, BCH, DAI
- Other assets supported: XAU (Gold), XAG (Silver), XGB (Goldback)
- Wide range of fiat currencies and payment methods to choose from
- Minimum trade and deposit amount reduced to 0.02 XMR (default: 0.1 XMR)
- Minimum deposit percentage reduced to 5% (default: 15%)
- Fees set to 0.6% to cover systems cost and maintain a self-sustaining network
- Custom installation paths for side-by-side use with other Haveno based networks
- Arbitrators 24/7 available for timely dispute resolution following official Haveno procedure
- Non-Custodial: Users maintain control over their funds
- Privacy-Focused: Utilizes Monero and Tor for secure transactions
- Reliable decentralized infrastructure for maximum availability
The Dawnswap project aims to always be a community-driven initiative to keep building in the original spirit of the Haveno project.
- Dawnswap website: https://dawnswap.com/
- [MIRROR] Dawnswap website https://dawn-collective.net/
- Dawnswap github : https://github.com/dawn-collective/haveno-dawn/
- Dawnswap contact: https://www.dawnswap.com/contact.html
We invite also XMR traders to offer their services on Dawnswap.
" Decentralization can only be achieved by many and freedom of choice. "
Jesus these guys are running a network and have no clue about Havenos history. It was in fact VERY MUCH intended to only have one network. I know this because I was voted by the community to be on the council that was supposed to run it…
Haveno is already decentralized, secondary networks have nothing but downsides, negatively impacting the Monero DEX experience for all users.
I’m afraid that is incorrect and it would be better if one of the core Haveno project devs if they’re around provide an official word on this and prevent confusion. In the meantime here are some links on the official Haveno-dex github showing how lively this is and important to have Haveno instances and progress to for example federation. Not only good for the ecosystem resiliency by having decentralized Haveno instances but also tackle the issue of fragmentation.
https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/901 https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/1771 and more if you search
Also from the official haveno.exchange website faq you can follow the logic of the q/a, it is not intended to be used for 1 network (which is a single point of failure as you know).
https://haveno.exchange/faq/#how-can-i-run-haveno https://haveno.exchange/faq/#whats-the-structure-of-haveno
How new are you guys? I am talking about the history, not what was put up afterwards. Originally there was supposed to be 1 network, run by the engine council.
We only have 1 Monero network, is that a single point of failure? I hear nobody arguing that there should be a second one.
MoneroBull, not to create confusion, but you’re comparing apples with knives.
Any knife can cut an apple, but people choose which one to use because knife manufacturers compete with each other to make theirs the best quality possible, but any apple can be cut, just in a different way.
>Originally there was supposed to be 1 network, run by the engine council.
Yes, but then the devs decided to not take risk. That makes sense, and I don’t see why there shouldn’t be another network.
Fragmentation might negatively impact user experience, but it is not a huge problem, and it can be mitigated by implementing federation. I even suggested a possible architecture when federation was discussed in the matrix room.
@monero
You’re most welcome to send a private message or post here to explain the history you’re talking about or provide some resources to read, that is always interesting. For the rest, we’re focussing on the present and the future to do something good and be part of the monero community. No bad intent here and it was expected that we would be grilled when going public. Thanks anyway for your input !