You’re most welcome to send a private message or post here to explain the history you’re talking about or provide some resources to read, that is always interesting. For the rest, we’re focussing on the present and the future to do something good and be part of the monero community. No bad intent here and it was expected that we would be grilled when going public. Thanks anyway for your input !

I’m afraid that is incorrect and it would be better if one of the core Haveno project devs if they’re around provide an official word on this and prevent confusion. In the meantime here are some links on the official Haveno-dex github showing how lively this is and important to have Haveno instances and progress to for example federation. Not only good for the ecosystem resiliency by having decentralized Haveno instances but also tackle the issue of fragmentation.

https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/901 https://github.com/haveno-dex/haveno/issues/1771 and more if you search

Also from the official haveno.exchange website faq you can follow the logic of the q/a, it is not intended to be used for 1 network (which is a single point of failure as you know).

https://haveno.exchange/faq/#how-can-i-run-haveno https://haveno.exchange/faq/#whats-the-structure-of-haveno

Monerobull, i enjoy reading some of your posts on Reddit and that you’re very active in the Monero community. I hope you understand this is not the way to attack a new initiative by trying to corner people to 1 service. It is completely against the Haveno Network initiative and intention of the developers who put in blood, sweat and tears to get that off the ground. Mark my words, we need decentralization, choice and more cooperation in the community.

Kindly see my reply to TheFuzzStone. As for I2P, i hope this will be possible and perhaps a bounty program can be setup for the Haveno Network developers to do this. We rather help Haveno then creating an I2P solution which might or might not work and try to convince Haveno to implement our code. As for RetoSwap vs DawnSwap, we’re new but assume the Reto team knows it is critical and in the Haveno spirit to have real decentralization, choice and avoid the CEX trap turning into a single point of failure.

Hello,

Read your concerns and assuming you’re a concerned citizen of the Monero community;

Feel free to compare the souce code with Haveno on Github and compile it yourself. I’m sure there are plenty of knowledgeable devs in our community who do this by default. If you’re also familiar with how Haveno works and you did the above then you know it’s a non-custodial solution unlike a CEX for example.

At the end it’s the same way when Reto came to life, chicken and the egg story, what counts is hard proof as in code and making sure Monero is as decentralized as possible. No one wants 1 exchange and a single point of failure as this was never intended by the Haveno Network project.

Thank you again for your concerns and feel free to post my reply on your Reddit thread.

Dawn

Thank you @HardenedSteel for the heads up, we’re waiting for the ssl certificate deployment as we speak. In the meantime our main website is a mirror which for now will give a valid ssl connection: https://dawn-collective.net/

UPDATE: https://dawnswap.com/ has its ssl certificate active and loading nicely