• GhostlyPixel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    According to the suit, Ramacciotti was in need of money, and had a friend named Ethan Lipnik who worked at Apple as a software engineer on the Photos team – two facts that Prosser was aware of when he allegedly offered to pay Ramacciotti to break into Lipnik’s development iPhone and show Prosser what the version of iOS running on the device looked like.

    Ramacciotti, who frequently stayed at Lipnik’s home, allegedly used location-tracking software to determine when Lipnik was far enough from home to be gone for an extended period. During such windows, he allegedly used the opportunity to obtain the passcode and access the device.

    Apple isn’t a very pro WFH or remote work company from what I learned when I was job hunting, I’m honestly surprised they let a dev iPhone leave their campus.

    • sparky@lemmy.federate.cc@lemmy.federate.cc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Former Apple employee here, hardware is almost never let off campus but software alone can be. For example software engineers working on iOS, like this guy, would probably have development builds installed on their personal devices. It’s allowed but you’re obviously not supposed to let anyone else see or use the new features.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      There was a big scandal some years back because an Apple employee left a prototype phone at the bar/restaurant next to the campus, so they definitely do it. I’m a bit surprised that they didn’t crack down harder after that incident, but to be fair to this guy, he didn’t take it out and about and just took it home. I can’t say I’d be overly worried about something happening to it if it was just at my house, but I also don’t have people crashing with me frequently…

        • proudblond@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Knock it off with that making me feel old stuff, geeze man. (Holy shit, it’s been 15 years?!)

      • EntropyPure@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Remember that one, but honestly: not worth much testing a device exclusively in laboratory settings and not in real life situations.

        It is a risk but I think not one you can and should avoid. At least if you want your mobile device to perform.

        • chellomere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Yeah, when I was working for one major smartphone manufacturer, we were handed prototype phones to take home and test.

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      21 hours ago

      A long time ago I did some work that involved apple v Samsung and they were pretty strict about even showing a dev device over a voip call.

      Exterior window blinds had to be shut, screens set up on the interior so you couldn’t see through the doors, no recording devices, legal representation on-site to verify.