fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoResourcesmander.xyzimagemessage-square242fedilinkarrow-up1849arrow-down145
arrow-up1804arrow-down1imageResourcesmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square242fedilink
minus-square𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·2 months agoFrom what i’ve heard, with the aging population in developed countries and the birthrate getting lower due to longer life expectancy, population should soon stabilise itself around 10 billions. Seems viable.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 months agoNot when a fraction of it “needs” everything. But that’s another problem ofc.
minus-squaregandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoYeah population growth really follows a sigmoid curve:
From what i’ve heard, with the aging population in developed countries and the birthrate getting lower due to longer life expectancy, population should soon stabilise itself around 10 billions. Seems viable.
Not when a fraction of it “needs” everything. But that’s another problem ofc.
Yeah population growth really follows a sigmoid curve: