• naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Not in a meaningful timeframe, I think. Even if we get a worst case outcome (say +5°C by 2100, ongoing warming), permanent land ice in Antarctica will likely take many hundreds, or even thousands of years to melt entirely.

    It’s always going to have frozen winters with lots of snow, due to the long dark polar winter… I guess some boreal tundra species could survive that, but farming is probably unlikely to be viable, I would guess.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Earlier tonight I was watching a video going over sone climate predictions. There was a legit worst case scenario of an ice-free Arctic Ocean as early as 2030. Once one pole goes, it’s hard to see the other tensing frozen much longer

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Sea ice (most of the arctic) is VERY different to land ice (which is most of Antarctica). Check some sea ice maps and ice thickness maps to see the difference.

        Also, the two hemispheres are not tightly coupled over short (decadal scales). The Arctic has been warming much faster than the Antarctic (so far).

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      i was reading about how the penguins create a bunch of weather in Antarctica with their fields of poop. It causes lots of snow storms because the ammonia and other components of the their waste, seed the moisture in the air to create weather patterns.

      so they might be keeping chunks of Antarctica snow covered and they would have to be displaced before any real changes would happen. the ice melt wouldn’t stop them from moving further inland