The article alleges that Matrix:

  • has links to Israeli intelligence.
  • sends a lot of sensitive data to matrix.org servers, even when Synapse is self-hosted.

Is this information accurate?

  • Tad Lispy@europe.pubOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    That wouldn’t apply to conversations you have within a group that hosts their own server, would it? Like within a family or a club.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If anyone in your group has an account is hosted on Matrix.org, yes. If no one is, no.

      But that puts a huge limitation on the platform so, why bother?

      • anytimesoon@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Isn’t this the same limitation of any federated platform? If you communicate with someone from a different instance your data will be replicated on their instance

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          No, not all platforms store metadata, much less absolutely all of it unencrypted. Further, other platforms are less centralized.

          • Tad Lispy@europe.pubOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            What’s a better alternative? Which other platforms are you referring to? How do they compare in terms of features and adoption? From all the decentralised, e2e encrypted platforms I tried, matrix is the only one more or less accessible for normies.