Deceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 个月前observes your slitquokk.auimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1506arrow-down119
arrow-up1487arrow-down1imageobserves your slitquokk.auDeceptichum@quokk.au to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 3 个月前message-square43fedilink
minus-squaresbird@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·3 个月前top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
minus-squareLOGIC💣@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·3 个月前Oh I see I was overthinking it.
minus-squarex00z@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-23 个月前Don’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
minus-squareBjörn@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 个月前Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
minus-squareZiglin (it/they)@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 个月前Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.
top is interference patterns (like a wave) while bottom is as if it’s a particle (only two slits)
Oh I see I was overthinking it.
Don’t worry. You were both right and wrong until we observed it.
Though as far as I’m aware the patterns usually aren’t that nuanced in reality.
Do you mean that they are not as noisy?
More noisy.
Huh. When looking at light interference patterns I always thought that they looked less noisy, especially when showing a spectrum.