• jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    I didn’t know that was something that’s been available in Chrome. Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

    • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s highly popular in the anime scene for its ability to contain original audio and dubs and a few subtitle tracks, including custom fonts for some of the subtitle formats that are feeling particularly special.

      • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not that firefox actually supports any of those advanced sub formats lol (I’d be surprised if chrome did either though tbh)

        • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Absolutely true. But it’s relatively easy, I assume, given that webm is just a subset of mkv anyway, and why not!

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also not entirely sure what I would use it for since I’ve mostly seen it with rips of Blu-ray movies and shows, never smaller files. I thought its main advantage was holding multiple video, audio, and data streams.

      WebM shows that Matroska is excellent for streaming. It’s the same container, WebM just mandates a set of codecs (just as MP4 as an offshoot of MOV can theoretically hold non-MPEG codecs but nobody supports this in the real world). With formal Matroska support, something like combining a HEVC video track with an Opus audio would be possible.