• InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    209
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t think dinosaurs were taking x-rays of beaver tails, my dude. Go read a book sometime.

    • zip@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This may seem cheesy or pathetic, and I apologize for that, but I want to say: thank you for catching me off guard with your silly comment and giving me a badly-needed smile and laugh when I’m fucking miserable and in a lot of pain. It’s been a while. Seriously, I appreciate it. You’re a hoot :)

        • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nah, you’re thinking of the much more dangerous “acceleraptors”. Velociraptors were very different from how they are commonly portrayed.

            • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              21 hours ago

              No, much like how brontosaurus was later discovered to be a mix of bones from various individuals, “Distanceraptor” is actually a conflation of multiple Displacemosaurids.

              • ellohir@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                Sorry to break these news to you but in 2015 they discovered that Brontosaurus actually existed, so the “it was a mix of other species bones” is wrong, as much as a fun fact it was 😟

                • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  7 hours ago

                  Thanks for the fascinating read! It seems like the specific taxonomy is still far from certain and needs validation, by the study authors’ own admission, but you’re absolutely correct that it wasn’t the bones of multiple species! I could swear there was another one of those from Germany that was a mishmash. Do you remember what that one was? I’m just a geochemist, not a palaeontologist. But anyway, I look forward to seeing validation studies by others of the 2015 findings! It would be great to see all of that hard work pay off! Do you know of any? I wasn’t able to find any from a cursory glance around the internet.