• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Was about to say that. It’s sad that your comment is the very last in this thread.

      • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        1: it’s not last, and 2: it’s not sad, because 3: people aren’t reading the source material. I love xkcd, too, but that doesn’t apply here.

        Just because results don’t match expectations doesn’t mean we should throw pies of satire in their face. That’s like the response in the OP of ‘no’. This is actually interesting.

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          The data does not support the conclusion. A simple “no” is okay. Take a look at these examples of regression. See how any one of the conclusions is absurd? Mind you the data in that example is far less random!

    • Don Piano@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      How do you think a case of “this explains some of the differences in the population, but not a lot” should look?

      And that looks potentially fine for an error bar. For a mean estimate, SE=SD/√N , so depending on what error band they used this looks quite plausible.