• BzzBiotch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Let’s throw a clanker at a problem that obviously needs a human solution. What could go wrong?

    Also: would it maybe be cheaper to just hire a human for this? Seems like the development of such a machine would be much more expensive that just hiring a guy.

    • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I mean it’s definitely more expensive to pay someone for their time assuming you’d presumably have an army of these to replace with people. But it’d also be am actual solution instead of whatever fresh hell this is

      • BzzBiotch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I don’t think it’s more expensive to hire people for this work than to develop and produce a bunch of robots that are obviously not up to the task.

        How could they ever be? Loneliness can only be adressed through sincere human contact. Any other (robotic) solution is financially wasteful at best and disastrously counterproductive at worst.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Developing the robots is mostly up front costs (between paying someone to “code” the thing and then buying the units) vs paying however many employees forever which is why I say it’s more expensive.

          If they could make an actual genai I think it could help with loneliness but we won’t be there anytime soon, if ever, the way they keep following a strategy of scaling and optimizing a speech center.

    • coolmojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I suspect a seven year old little girl wouldn’t ask for too much salary either. /s