Here’s my attempt to explain the situation in a brief way. DHH, the creator of Ruby on Rails, wrote some things which are considered racist by some people. This caused a prominent Ruby programmer to withdraw his large sponsorship of Ruby Central, a non-profit which organises Ruby conferences, because DHH spoke at one of their conferences. Therefore Ruby Central ended up very dependent on Shopify, a large company, for funding. One theory (mentioned in the article) is that Shopify (where DHH is a board member) then pressured Ruby Central to perform a “hostile takeover” of the RubyGems GitHub organisation, where they revoked the maintainer privileges of long-time contributors. What is RubyGems? It’s a website which is the de facto standard source for “gems”, which are Ruby packages. I guess this is equivalent to NPM in the Node/JavaScript world.

If you want to know the potentially racist stuff said by DHH, he essentially seemed to be unhappy that London is “no longer full of native Brits”. He says “native Brits” now make up “about a third” of London. So by “native Brits” he seems to mean the White British ethnic group, because they made up 37% of London in the 2021 census.

The Ruby programmer who withdrew his sponsorship of Ruby Central (allegedly worth $250,000 according to the article) said this: “I rescinded a six-figure grant because the org invited DHH, a white supremacist, to speak. We cannot tolerate hateful people as leaders in our communities.”

The “hostile takeover” of RubyGems has led some Ruby programmers to create an alternative to the RubyGems website. This alternative is gem.coop. Also there is an open letter signed by influential Ruby programmers which calls for Ruby on Rails to be forked so that DHH no longer has an association with it.

The article that this post links to is an update to the situation: Ruby Central is now taking steps to try and cool the controversy.

Thoughts on this?

Edit: fixed typo.

  • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Is it okay for DHH to express his unhappiness that London is no longer mostly White British? He said “I thought I might move there one day… Now, I wouldn’t dream of it. London is no longer the city I was infatuated with in the late '90s and early 2000s. Chiefly because it’s no longer full of native Brits.”

    Let’s say a lot of white people move to a previously black area. This causes a prominent person to write a blog saying “I thought I might move there one day… Now, I wouldn’t dream of it. It’s no longer the place I was infatuated with. Chiefly because it’s no longer full of black residents.” That would be racist wouldn’t it?

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Is it okay for DHH to express his unhappiness that London is no longer mostly White British?

      No. Dude is a racist baby. It’s also the transphobia and support for open fascists.

      Let’s say a lot of white people move to a previously black area.

      Let’s not say that reverse racism is a real thing, because that’s an imaginary racist trope.

      • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Let’s not say that reverse racism is a real thing, because that’s an imaginary racist trope.

        My view is that racism can happen to any ethnicity: black, brown, white, anybody. It depends on the situation. If a business run entirely by white people disallows entry to a black person because they’re black, that’s racist, but if the races were reversed (a business run entirely by black people disallows entry to a white person because they’re white), I’d say that’s also racist. In fact if I end up talking to a white person about racism I might deliberately give them an example of a situation where a white person could experience racial discrimination, because that might make them think “fair point, I would dislike it if someone was racist to me, so maybe racism is a bad thing”.

    • jonathan@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I’m not sure it’s worth engaging with the kind of person who uses SJW as a pejorative.

      • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m just interested to see what the other side of the argument might be. Sometimes you might very strongly disagree with other people’s views, or even be disgusted by those views, but you might still want to find out what those views are.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Sometimes you might very strongly disagree with other people’s views, or even be disgusted by those views, but you might still want to find out what those views are.

          Sure, but if they’re using SJW as a pejorative, you already know what their (disgusting) views are. I have yet to meet one of these people who didn’t fall into a rather specific shitty box when it comes to certain viewpoints.

          • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Especially nowadays, long after “SJW” stopped being commonly used. If they’re still holding on to a 2016 anti-SJW “everyone’s so offended!!” mentality, they’re probably not worth engaging with. Just shows they never matured past that point.

        • andyburke@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Sure, just know that this feedback is coming from people who have probably walked the same path and are trying to save you some pain. Best of luck, but I have found people like that are not engaging in good faith.

    • Greg Clarke@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Why do you assume that a Danish person talking about “native Brits” means “white”?

      • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Firstly because when he says London is “no longer full of native Brits” he links to a Wikipedia page about ethnic groups in London. So he seems to be talking about ethnicity. Secondly, he says that these “native Brits” are now “about a third” of London. Looking at the Wikipedia page he linked to, the stats show that white Brits were 37% of London according to the 2021 census, which is about a third. It seems to me that’s probably what he’s talking about.

        If “native Brits” just meant people born in the UK, or people with a British passport, then those figures are higher: 59% and 77% of London respectively (that page says that “In 2021, more than 4 in 10 (40.6%) usual residents in London were non-UK born, and more than 1 in 5 (23.3%) had a non-UK passport”).

    • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes, it is ok. Different people have different tastes in cultural, social, etc neighborhoods. This guy prefers classical British culture. See no wrong here.

      • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        He doesn’t seem to be talking about culture. He didn’t say something like “London has fewer pubs than it used to”. Instead he seems to be referring specifically to ethnicity. His interest in London seems to be reduced because more non-white people now live in London.

        • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          36
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Ethnicity is linked to culture in a very straightforward and obvious way. You’re just making drama here.

          • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Ethnicity and culture are different. A person can choose to adopt whatever culture they want regardless of their ethnicity. Also if you said something like “I don’t want that particular ethnicity to move to my neighbourhood due to their culture” then I think that’s probably racist. I think it’s fine to object to certain cultural aspects as long as you don’t tie it to ethnicity though. E.g. if you said “I object to a cultural practice of treating women worse than men” then I think that’s okay.

            • Lembot_0004@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              29
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Ethnicity and culture are different. A person can choose to adopt whatever culture they want regardless of their ethnicity.

              Correct. And now the question: how can someone detect ethnicity without obvious cultural nuances? Obviously, that guy is talking about people who practice alien and unpleasant cultural practices. And don’t care about local culture. Some immigrants accommodate plus share some interesting culture approaches. Others – completely disregard local culture and behave like they are still at home.

              Go to ignore. I’m sick of explaining to every kid around what the difference is between nazism/racism/chauvinism/stereotypes and common sense.

              • grindemup@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 hours ago

                Go to ignore. I’m sick of explaining to every kid around what the difference is between nazism/racism/chauvinism/stereotypes and common sense.

                Hmm, maybe you should try understanding those concepts first before you share with everyone that you are in fact a racist. Some food for thought.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                I’m sick of explaining to every kid around what the difference is between nazism/racism/chauvinism/stereotypes and common sense

                Seems like you’re not doing a good job of it, but you also don’t have a good take on those meanings based on your comments, so that’s to be expected.

                • TheMcG@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  Sounds like they are just tired of being correctly called out for their “common sense” just being racism.

              • moderatecentrist@feddit.ukOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                I think DHH is talking about ethnicity specifically though, not culture. He said London is “no longer full of native Brits”, and he describes “native Brits” as now forming “about a third” of London. White Brits were 37% of London at the 2021 census, so I think that’s what he’s talking about.

                It’s possible to express disagreement with a cultural practice without making it about ethnicity. E.g. someone might object to men and women being separated for religious prayer. They might believe that men and women should pray together. It’s possible to make that point without making it about ethnicity.

          • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Damn man, you are really bending over backward to defend this guy… do you owe him money or something?