fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agoeel buttsmander.xyzimagemessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1608arrow-down12
arrow-up1606arrow-down1imageeel buttsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square42fedilink
minus-squareDevjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 days agoAnd fish don’t even exist.
minus-squareFiskFisk33@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down2·2 days agoyes they do, but not as a useful, well defined category in biology.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 day agoit’s a morphological category, not cladistic. Like how “tree” is any plant with a thick robust trunk and branchy crown.
And fish don’t even exist.
yes they do, but not as a useful, well defined category in biology.
it’s a morphological category, not cladistic.
Like how “tree” is any plant with a thick robust trunk and branchy crown.