• Oberyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Man, Nothing really fell off . And dœs 3a Lite need to exist like at all ⁉️

  • mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bruh. This is truly surprising. I feel like for a phone like this, it must be like 90% of the target market that would hate this? Seems like an unimaginably bad business decision. Of course, if FB gave them enough money, then this is kinda like taking a bribe to stop competing.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      They are pivoting to a new customer base, people who are vaguely aware privacy is a concern but aren’t capable of figuring out nothing phones are a scam.

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are only those companies for whom the incentives to betray you aren’t yet high enough. Either the incentives become high enough for the chosen company to betray you, or the incentives become enough for another company with enough money to buy the chosen company and betray you…or bury the chosen company in the hopes that you’ll open yourself to being betrayed or exploited by the other company.

        Welcome to unfettered/unregulated capitalism aka the natural end result that capitalism pushes society towards.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Nothing already lost me when they put a tiny, useless OLED screen on the back of their flagship and called it innovation. They had something really great with the Glyph lights for two generations, so of course they ditched that technology completely.

      Not even Unihertz put Facebook garbage on their new Titan 2 phone. And they also have an OLED on the back. A much bigger one. For a fraction of the price.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh good, one less phone to consider.

    I would literally sooner intentionally install malware in my phone than anything from Meta.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    155
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow, nothing is a shit name, for one. On the other hand, this being reported on a website that requires tracking consent to view. I want a new Timeline.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nothing would be a great brand name if they were dedicated to making good phones without any bloatware.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        The misinterpretation with the name nothing to the regular word nothing in headlines and everything is really bad, especially since the internet is global and for countries who never heard the name.

        Some people think they’re really clever with their company name and cause lots of confusion with it for their narrow mindedness.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Of course there are. But in this case the headline could be read:

        Nothing’s new:…

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          I think you missed it. “Nothing is a shit name” can be read as “there are no shit names.”

          (Unless I misread your comment and missed something.)

    • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Shareholder pressure? Asshole CEO that masked who he was so far? Who can say. Seems to be the general trend now though.

  • root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is a major bummer. I was kinda rooting for them to be the OEM that GOS would be working with.

      • root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh? TIL. I guess if they’ve ruled out fairphone and nothing is as bad as you say, maybe it’s a larger player. Can’t think of many other small ones.

        • Tangent5280@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Moto seems like a contender. Or one of the Chinese players like Oneplus or Xiaomi, they are also looking for an edge over the market.

          • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Personally I think it’ll be one of the bigger Chinese OEMs. Their phones have gotten a lot better recently, and security is pretty much the only thing they’re lacking. A move like this would perfectly fit some of their strategies.

            We’ll see what happens. I’m enjoying analyzing the market to speculate which company it may be.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Before reading this, it would have never occurred to me that anyone even considered this possibility. And thank God it’s not happening. Their phones are abysmal dogshit.

  • ook@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Welp, and some people hypothesized Nothing would be the secret manufacturer that GrapheneOS works with. Hope not, I’m not sure what Nothing would get out of it with these kinds of actions.