I posted the answer in full because that was the output. Anything else would have been manipulation on my part. However, I don’t think the same answer can still be reproduced in short time.
Of course, LLMs currently also give counterarguments, but for how much longer?
What do you expect? A one-line answer to a complex question?
You should be interested in this because it is already influencing public opinion. Whether you think that’s a good thing or not is irrelevant—it’s simply a fact, whether you like it or not.
What else can I say, except that it doesn’t make sense to bury your head in the sand. I’m not a big fan of LLMs, but I’m aware of the fact that billions of people already use this tech in all areas of their lives. That’s a fact, and your rejection doesn’t change that at all. If you had read the post properly, you would understand that the issue here is the influence this technology has on opinion-forming. My opinion: it is ushering in an age of targeted disinformation. I had hoped to hear your opinion on this, but it seems that even a basic understanding is impossible due to your refusal to accept reality.
Do you believe you are the center of the world? Do you believe that what you read on a low-reach social media application is reality? Seriously, you should wake up.
If you think LLMs are irrelevant, there is nothing more to say.
I posted the answer in full because that was the output. Anything else would have been manipulation on my part. However, I don’t think the same answer can still be reproduced in short time.
Of course, LLMs currently also give counterarguments, but for how much longer?
What do you expect? A one-line answer to a complex question?
What I expect is comments written by humans containing thoughts they came up with themselves. I don’t care what an AI pretends to think.
You should be interested in this because it is already influencing public opinion. Whether you think that’s a good thing or not is irrelevant—it’s simply a fact, whether you like it or not.
I should be interested in what? I know that people use AI to form their opinions, does that mean I also need to read slop?
What else can I say, except that it doesn’t make sense to bury your head in the sand. I’m not a big fan of LLMs, but I’m aware of the fact that billions of people already use this tech in all areas of their lives. That’s a fact, and your rejection doesn’t change that at all. If you had read the post properly, you would understand that the issue here is the influence this technology has on opinion-forming. My opinion: it is ushering in an age of targeted disinformation. I had hoped to hear your opinion on this, but it seems that even a basic understanding is impossible due to your refusal to accept reality.
The fuck do you mean bury my head in the sand? You’re not giving me any reason why I should read AI written slop. What are you on about?
Do you believe you are the center of the world? Do you believe that what you read on a low-reach social media application is reality? Seriously, you should wake up.
If you think LLMs are irrelevant, there is nothing more to say.
Mate. Where did I say LLM’s are “irrelevant”? Are you hallucinating? Did the AIs infect you with their hallucinating?
Honestly, I’d rather talk to an LLM than to you. Not that it would be any more fulfilling, but it’s just as pointless.
One answer an LLM won’t give you: Fuck off, mate.