• jokro@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Alternatively i can just download them on each device and have better load times?

    At least the games i play are small enough (<150GB each). And i dont need more than few them, one is enough usually.

    • UltraMagnus@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s good for rural areas and areas without many internet options. Even my internet isn’t really that bad, and it would still take a few hours to download a game that large. It would be convenient to just take an SD card from one device and put it into another.

      I’m glad that they’re thinking about these edge case scenarios. Valve is good about this- for example, I’ve never needed any of steam’s accessibility options, but I’m glad they are there.

    • scala@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Correct. You can also share the download from one machine to another on your WiFi. And even across your friends(for faster torrent-like download).

      You can also use your PC as a cloud host and the frame/machine streams the game off that PC rather than needing all the graphics powered the device itself.

    • anguo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      2 days ago

      You consider 150GB small?!? The biggest games I have downloaded were around 80GB, and I found that excessive.

    • Mereo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      1 Gbit internet connections are not yet universal. And some parts of the world still have slow internet.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Copy it over the network instead so its on the internal memory of both devices. Uses your fast LAN instead of slow internet.

      • ashughes@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yup! Sitting here on 70 down / 18 up, fastest money can by around here. If I’m going to play a game I haven’t downloaded yet I usually have to plan a day in advance.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Or if they implement a copy feature, move the SD card over and copy a game to internal, so you can more quickly transfer over a game without removing it from the SD card.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Steam also supports local file transfers for game downloads. Like if your PC has a game downloaded and you start to download it on your Deck, the Deck will ask if you want to download it directly from your PC. It means your download speed is primarily limited by your LAN and PC hardware, (which is probably at least gigabit these days), instead of whatever arbitrary speed cap your ISP has implemented.

        But technically speaking, carrying an SD card across the house would likely have higher data speeds. The latency sucks, but the bandwidth is only limited by the size of the card and how quickly you’re able to walk across the house. Hell, if you have a stack of large hard drives and it only takes you a few seconds to walk across a small living area, your total measured bandwidth could be measured in tens of terabytes per second. There’s an old joke that a carrier pigeon flying across town with a stack of SD cards would have higher bandwidth than any modern network.