Next idea : Shining ads in space, powered by sunlight, so people always have something to look at. /puke

Whats the alternative?

I dont think the bubble will pop but I also dont think there will ever be agi from this.

This is primitive tech and cant do agi. We would need something completely different than language models.

Yeah maybe that is how it went down. I like your version of events and would like to believe that is what happened actually.

I think he should be careful, yeah. Then after that, you read a whole lot more into that… :)

We dont know eachother, but its fun to see how you interpret these things and how you think im being toxic.

I dont think we are ever gonna agree on this topic, so… See you around Lemmy. :)

It really isnt anywhere near Kagi in search quality or results. I think its important to be honest here. If you dont want to pay to search, fine, but you will get much worse results.

Could be fine for your usecase though. Maybe you only search for major sites.

Haha you are wrong about that one, 100% :)

Isnt that the woman who bent down to Trump to fuck over Europe?

This post is like 2 years old guys. :)

Ah ok, engadget appearently updated the content to 2025 using the same link used 2 years ago…

Yeah. Maybe Debian testing is fine. Couple of months delay is not a huge deal, even though i really want the latest packages myself. When a new version of plasma or gnome is released, im right there waiting for it immediately… :)

I know from experience its just not just a couple of months if we are talking Debian stable.

Here is what chat gpt is saying, even though the versions is already outdated:

Debian Stable lags behind Arch Linux by roughly 1–3 years on most core packages:

Breakdown by category:

Linux kernel~6–18 months behindRolling, latest~1 year

GCC / LLVM / Clang~1–2 major versions behindLatest stable1–2 years

Python / Node / Go1–3 versions behindLatest stable1–2 years

GNOME / KDE / XFCE One major release behindCurrent1–1.5 years

SystemdUsually current − 1Current6–12 months glibc / coreutilsOften within ~1 yearCurrent6–12 months

Security patchesBackported rapidlyUpstream latest0 delay on fixes

In practice:

Debian 12 (Bookworm, mid-2023) ships kernel 6.1, GCC 12, GNOME 43.

Arch (today) has kernel 6.11, GCC 14, GNOME 47.

So Debian Stable is about 2 years behind Arch overall, though security backports mean it’s not “outdated” for production.

Yeah I remember that. It was a very rare event though. For Linux users that want the latest versions, this will happen and there is no way to avoid it.

We take risks either way. Either by using old bugs or new bugs.

I think all apps should be much more sandboxed than they are today, but it would require a new way of writing and running apps. We have Flatpak though, its a start.

You dont know which version Debian is using of software? You can go check if you actually want to know.

Then you can take that version and go to bugzilla or whatever bug tracking software its using, and see bugs fixed in newer versions.

Well yeah, I wouldnt use it as a server.

I know Debian is trying to make software work well together but they are still on ancient versions full of old bugs.

There isnt any bad sides, not really.

It used to be hard to install but that is also not the case anymore.

People think its unstable because it has the latest packages. I mean, sometimes i have had issues, sure. A few times, bluetooth stack was bugging out in the newest kernel. Another time plasma had bugs with graphics, which I reported and it was fixed just a few weeks later.

Nothing that broke the entire system. Just small issues.

But this is much better than running Debian which has very old packages, full of old bugs. They used to be a full generation behind in plasma for example, and using a kernel that was over a year old. Those things leads to poor hardware support, getting bugs solved over a year ago and so on.

I really dont understand Debian users because ive never experienced how an updated system is worse than a very old one.

He will probably be back in a few days.

If you cant understand basic things, then sure. Very toxic. Lol.

I have paid for it since it started so have to say yes. Never going back to Google.

Other search engines have much worse results.

Yeah. I remember reading about Adam Smith in school, and it made perfect sense then. But after seeing the actual world, it seems it just falls apart.

Amazing analys doctor, but I think you may be seeing yourself in this rather than me…

Im not very toxic, just very honest about what I see. Even when its unpopular.