If he thinks something doesn’t matter just because the people involved are dead, maybe history is not the right academic field for him.
Polyculture farming is good for the land and good for yields, but monoculture is easier for the government to rule over.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/03/16/book-review-seeing-like-a-state/
https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/10/14/book-review-against-the-grain/
XML is good for markup. The problem is that people too often confuse “markup” and “serialization”.
Yup that’s what I mean.
Seems like a reasonable limitation then (not that the entire business model of scientific journals is reasonable in the 21st century is reasonable - just this specific limitation). The journal’s theme is proprietary, but the paper’s authors still have the LaTeX source so they can just slap a free preamble on it and publish it with that.
So basically the article you are allowed to release can have its typesetting - it just can’t have the journal’s preamble/theme?
or even sometimes the peer-reviewed, but NOT typeset article
What does that mean? The LaTeX source?
“Your brakes operation will resume after this 10s ad”
You are assuming here that I know what I want. What if there is no obviously correct answer, and even in the Everett branch that generates the optimal content for the file I’ll still think it can be improved and tell it to destroy the universe?
What if there is no correct answer?
I just use this:
#!/bin/bash
keep_generating=1
while [[ $keep_generating == 1 ]]; do
dd if=/dev/random of=$1 bs=1 count=$2 status=none
echo Contents of $1 are:
cat $1
echo
read -p "Try generating again? " -s -n1 answer
while true; do
case $answer in
[Yy] )
echo
break
;;
[Nn] )
keep_generating=0
break
;;
*)
esac
read -s -n1 answer
done
done
I guess that answers the question from that meme?
We really should stop killing dragonflies for usage in the stained glass industry.
My pet theory is that Apple started to use that term because “App” can also be short for “Apple”.
Even when you are paying for the product you are still the product.
Wouldn’t they already have the right to do it because you’ve watched the first season?
I won’t argue that corporations wouldn’t steal other people’s work given the chance, but being able to do this is hardly worth the cost of not having copyrights on their own material. A Disney/Pixar/DreamWorks/etc. movie is not a stand-alone product - it’s mainly a feature-length commercial for a franchise. No copyrights means that the corporation doesn’t get revenue from the the merchandise created and sold by third parties.
Putting the “rect” in “rectangular”
Movie pitch - to pay all its lawsuits, OceanGate launches one final desperate mission to the wreck of the San José.