IDK, the Altman talk a few days ago sounded a lot like bargaining.

Hah, bunny suicides.

If I remember Devereaux, the village itself was set up to minimise that risk first and foremost, at the expense of optimisation for max yields. So, every year was around subsistence, never much above, but also never much lower.

…I have to say, “beer from the woods” sounds a lot better than I’d’ve thought.

Frankly, I can easily imagine them going “hey let’s got for a beer and see which one of our two paranoiacs freaks out first”.

Which, hilariously, neatly matches the machine-learning approach of “just keep shovelling data, it’ll work eventually”.

Is… Tharg unusual? Like, the rest are exaggerated for humor, but I’ve met more than one Tharg. Hell, at one point if I switched majors I’d be Tharg.

Occasionally…

Bait used to be believable.

Señor_Chang.gif

“If you don’t vote for Owens, you’re voting for Fuentez!”

Yeah, this is the correct take, I feel.

Exactly, “The amount of people who would probably agree with the manifesto on Lemmy is probably higher than people expect.”

It’s just not the Tankies.

I kinda wonder if it was a “Tell her to keep her arm raised until tomorrow, it’ll teach her to be more careful next time.” situation.

The joke is thinking it took Russia and China to take advantage of it.

…And they’re all moving up, sadly.

…Now that’s an idea.

Tge thing with conservapedia is Poe’s law makes it impossible to moderate. A conservative (heh) estimate is that 70% of that site is trolling.

IIRC it’s currently defined based on SI units.

…Niw that you say it, it’s kinda oddly fitting…