I mean, they didn’t bother you guys.

The guy was just cold, and the gal had a personal moment. Not their fault, that you two little kids were scared of strangers.

Kidding aside, and assuming what you’ve written is neither internet-talk nor standard schizophrenia tendencies, it might be carbon monoxide poisoning. It was a phenomenon, with haunted houses very often just having faulty heaters of some kind, causing hallucinations in the right doses.

Low-to-medium effort troll account… Can you at least tag the nsfw?

Wait has this been a widespread issue? I’ve only noticed this a couple weeks now, but I thought it was because the cat dropped my deck from the table 😶

What’s going on actually?

You can legally kill anyone related to someone who has had Disney+.

Iirc, the wife died, the husband sued, and they tried to say the husband can’t sue because HE had had the subscription a long time ago.

Each subscriber loses the right to sue for any of their loved ones.

After all, if they’re dead, they can’t sue you anyway

God damn acab I swear

… Yeah it is 🫠🥲

In literal terms it translates to “before-the-road” (pro - drómou)

(this literal translation includes the ambiguity of before- as in ‘temporally before’, or before- as in ‘in front of’)

So any way you slice it, it’s pretty ironic.

“Prodromou” is a Greek surname, with the rough meaning “the one who walks the road before others”.

So him being “a visionary” is fun, lol

What… What even is this comment. Why even pick these totally inconspicuous movies to fill your triplet?

I understand nothing.

Absolutely. Lovable. Still a cop.

Cow girlcock

I love the Figure 1 description.

I don’t know if it would be funnier if you pulled all this out of your ass for the joke, or if it was all real.

On one hand, an elaborate troll.

On the other, a scientifically well-learned polyglot cattle-farmer from Nepal with an unreliable memory and a penchant for pedantry.

I don’t know about proud, but you sure should be content.

Why not both tho

And Freddie clearly agreed with the sentiment too

I’m assuming they meant “talking to the parent, using less complicated, more mainstream words, even if the meaning is a little wrong as a result”.

Which in my opinion is an ok approach, even though this specific parent, just by posting here, appears tech- and lgbt- savvy enough to probably know at least some terms.

Also, they could have just said ‘not trans’ instead, if ‘cis’ would be too advanced.

Actually scratch that, I get using “straight” as non-lgbt. It is how is very commonly used outside of lgbt circles.

But not a bad thought on its own. just maybe a bit othering.

I mean… Understandable. I get it.

I mean, nearly all of them do, tbh. Especially the last one.

Ado rules

jpg go boo

Yep, this is the feeling