Your comment made my day. Thanks.
Anyone spreading this misinformation and trying gatekeep being an artist after the avant-garde movement doesn’t have an ounce of education in art history. Generative art, warts and all, is a vital new form of art that’s shaking things up, challenging preconceptions, and getting people angry - just like art should.
I still only see half a dog.
What dogs? There isn’t a single complete dog on here.
Entertainment.
If you want to run local AI stuff, the more VRAM and muscle you’ve got, the better.
Their policy could never stop anyone in the first place.
It’s a meme trying to force the mandella effect.
Using copyrighted works without permission isn’t illegal and shouldn’t be. You should check out this article by Kit Walsh, a senior staff attorney at the EFF, and this open letter by Katherine Klosek, the director of information policy and federal relations at the Association of Research Libraries.
Someone dumb enough could easily flatten someone backing up with that bug.
As long as your AI doesn’t somehow infringe on your training data, you’re allowed to use whatever you want, just like reviewers, analysts, and indexers do.
They’re trained on technical material too.
We need, Standard Fruit.
You’re good to go as long as it’s original enough. If it isn’t then that’s just copyright infringement. You might as well have right-clicked “save as”.
This isn’t always true.
Why do you have it?
Don’t believe this dog, for it only tells lies.