I only use work hardware for work. I only use work networks for work. I have a cell phone off wifi for everything else
- 2 Posts
- 959 Comments
GBU_28@lemm.eeto
Technology@lemmy.world•Portable drone jammer uses a Raspberry Pi tactical Software Defined RadioEnglish
81·1 year agoAnd ultimately if you are trying to macgyver together anti drone tech you are beyond fucked and should have spent that energy pursuing other means of privacy.
GBU_28@lemm.eeto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Liquid Death Quietly Adds Stevia to Tea DrinksEnglish
2·1 year agoYou’re cooked
GBU_28@lemm.eeto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•Liquid Death Quietly Adds Stevia to Tea DrinksEnglish
3·1 year agoIt’s not percent of total it’s percent of daily recommendation. I’m not defending that choice but it just isn’t the same.
GBU_28@lemm.eeto
Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.world•My employer blocking trusted adblock extensions but allowing ad blockers that whitelist corporate adsEnglish
42·1 year agoWhat the fuck? Is that in your employment agreement? If not stop immediately
deleted by creator
They literally just fucking sit there, I’ve seen Jumanji I know what they could do, they just choose not to
Relevant
Wouldn’t fungus be more immediately interested in being among us?
Poor impulse control. Join us patient gamers.
Tars is real, and he loves you
Ok, consider it done.
GBU_28@lemm.eeto
Ask Lemmy@lemmy.world•What was your earliest experiences with the Internet like? English
5·1 year ago19/f/Cali always
- Just make up with your spouse. Everybody disagrees and fights some, but holding out is just delaying getting back to good living
- The introvert EXPECTS the other to be chatting. You will absolutely upset their homeostasis if you clam up
- If you’re both introverts, enjoy that quiet time
You think a person’s worth is tied to their genes. Pretty yuck. I disagreed and explained how.
For the record I was calling YOU out for linking a person to their genes, just not directly, trying to be courteous to the conversation.
Keep replying now, and you’re just slapfighting. Not worth it. I said in the last comment our positions are well known and the conversation is functionally concluded.
It’s a bad gene. It’s literally the contextually appropriate description of a factor involved in a situation.
Sorry it hurts your feelings
We’ve both made our points and opinions known here.
I mean if it’s a damaged or failed it’s a bad gene. It caused ms!
It’s not shitting on a person, it’s discussing a condition.
I can understand that discussion can lead to eugenics style thoughts.
“Oh that person has tons of bad genes, they therefore are bad”. That’s wrong though, a person can have a super fucked up body but it doesn’t change their value or goodness.
When discussing a condition, the genes that improve or cause that condition can be described as good or bad.
Context matters.
It’s an article about curing baldness, all context is pre determined.
Like sure, if we’re just bringing anything up, why care about baldness when I can’t breathe underwater, or if I can’t raise the dead?



Lereddit hoomor