- 0 Posts
- 937 Comments
1·2 days agoDefcon 1 is white? I’d expect it to be red.
How many people have needed to pick up bricks from deep water in their pajamas?
6·3 days agoThis is why the Chinese openly releasing deepseek was such a kick in the balls to the LLM tech bros.
3·3 days agoHe and I still dance.
Sounds like los pollos hermanos
It’s the plan view of 4 equilateral triangles arranged into a tetrahedron. There are no right angles so Pythagoras doesn’t apply.
These instructions are in 3d.
actual left wing ideas are crushed by the billionaires that own the country
Worse, they are crushed by the low income voters who would benefit most from their implementation.
I was about to ask for this. Thanks!
In this case the AI voices are reading the exact copyrighted material so the original author or rights holder must be contacted to secure the necessary rights and licensing agreements. There is no free use argument.
Now, if the voices have been trained on copy protected sources to create a likenesses (e.g. Scarlet Johansson) then there could be a lawsuit.
Not sure what you are trying to say here. AI itself is an equation.
AI voices are not trained on books.
The ethical issue there is more around cloning celebrities
Stock market logic, sell one cybertruck for $1m and your whole inventory is now worth 10x
deleted by creator
Sparkling water is adults only. No kid wants to drink that.
But in the absence of compelling evidence, it’s pointless to wildly speculate about from my perspective
I think that is lazy and naive. For example, is it really pointless to speculate about the official explanation for, say, the deadliest mass shooting by a lone gunman in American history?
I mean, every single flight spraying chemicals is ridiculous.
But a conspiracy that a small number of jet planes have tanks specifically designed for spraying chemicals at high altitude is not unbelievable at all.
It’s totally feasible, just very expensive.
Either copyright doesn’t exist in its current form or AI companies don’t.