Yeah, but now you can calculate pi to 2000 decimal places.

Yeah. The are not going to make blu rays as simple as

[09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0]

Between the balls and anus.

Except remote viewing was 20-30 years later,

I’m drawing parallels. Not saying remote viewing is to cover for radar.

which technology do you believe that was a cover for?

Any technology that was being used to spy on the Russians.

That’s kind of a requisite in making these claims- there is some tech you are actually covering for.

I don’t need to be specific. The CIA were just looking for a way to explain how they received their intelligence information.

If remote viewing actually worked then it wouldn’t be declassified.

“True” is subjective. There is academic debate around the topic

Someone mistranslated Almah/Parthenos, the word for young girl, as virgin

I belive Remote viewing is similar.

And that software may or may not be very reliant on AWS

Not. Electrical Scada systems are usually airgapped from the Internet.

Aphex starter track

Captain Beefheart

The Tiny

Future sound of london

Ren

https://lemmy.ml/c/trains

Some others too

The seed for the random number generator isn’t usually exposed to the user. Also the AI service providers regularly update the model and/or weights, producing different outputs.

If you are running your own LLM on your own hardware you can guarantee repeatablity, but that’s not what your average Joe does.

I’ve seen dull men’s clubs on other platforms and was happy to see that female dull men were just as welcome to discuss garden tools and trains.

How does an anonymous person on Lemmy prove they are a woman?

So far I have semi-competent voice transcription

Lucky you. When I use voice transcription my English gets automatically translated into Welsh.

Agreed. The word “patterns” is an important qualification. LLMs are great for one off tasks, but not as part of a repeatable process.

Depends on your use case. Adding 0.000001*rand() to a large number retains the functionality as a calculator.

Your argument that AI isn’t useful may be valid, but claiming that AI is not repeatable is false.

Even as a tool it lacks predictability / reproducability

If you use the same seed on the same model with the same weights you get the same results.

“Go to red alert!”

“Are you sure Sir? That does mean changing the bulb”

Wearing a dress and moustache.