I wonder if there can be more than one important issue effecting our future at a time…
I wonder if there can be more than one important issue effecting our future at a time…
One side has stats that have down that Roe V Wade massively reduced crime as less children were born into the system or unwanted. The burden of an unwanted child can ruin both the parents and childs life. We’ve seen how abortion bans can lead to doctors being scared to do anything in some situations causing the mother to die.
The other side is people saying a fetus has a soul because an old book told them so.
It’s pretty clear which side should be backed. Not saying either side is perfect, but one side has a lot more supporting evidence than the other.
Let’s not forget, the pro choice side is just that, you have a choice. No one is forcing anything, the other side is. Again, the choice is clear to me.
The example of pushing a woman down the stairs is silly. The reason why it’s worse if she’s pregnant is because you took away her choice and opportunity to have that baby, after she is dealing with all that comes with being pregnant. That is not the same as a person who is a month in and doesn’t want it, by her choice.
I’m sure they do. But the thing is science at stats don’t back their stance.
There is no room for a discussion. It’s like one side saying “kill everyone” and the other side is saying “let’s not kill people” then people are like “well, let’s compromise and kill just some people, it’s only fair.” No, I’m done. Democrats have been way too tame and compromising for too long, I’m done entertaining this BS.
I’ve been scrolling through the comments to see the reaction to this trailer and this is the only comment that made me legit cringe.
I can tell you, later
And if there’s one kid in the bathroom or a person posted by the bathroom watching the monitor? This feels very police state, monitor and enforce not educate and encourage.
Or use it to elicit a response somewhere as a distraction for a prank or fight.
Or they could start monitoring for violent words being said.
A smoke alarm monitors for an emergency, this is for monitoring people. There is a difference.
It’s not hard to see how the path of “monitor and report” is sliding into a more police state mindset when it’s been show that the best deterrent is education. And before people say “do both”, no. Stuff like this makes kids see the school as the enemy, someone to work around and try to beat. It destroys any trust.
Not as bad as being shot.
This is taking the route of individual monitoring and public shaming to prevent vaping. That doesn’t work, especially with teens.
They hate’us cause they anus.
I can get this one more so. My business has a client side and a contractor side. People say “user” and it’s too ambiguous.
It’s that what this comment is? Everything is either bait, trolling, or not real. Only fools react to things on the Internet.
I doesn’t really, I know they explained why they made the choice. Dunno if I %100 agree with it but playing the game it doesn’t feel like that big of an issue, for me at least.
My point was more to say that she wasn’t a bounty hunter. A BH might be more aggressive and lean into combat more, where a Scoundrel is going to try to use tricks, smooth talking etc.
You’re using the dictionary definition and ignoring Star Wars established lore and terms.
https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Scoundrel
And she very much fits the mold of a Scoundrel. Have you ever watched Star Wars lol?
Honestly, about 5 hours in and I love it. More depth than I expected. Actual stealth with multiple mechanics around it. The gang rep system. It’s great. I have mixed feelings on Kay as a person, but I’m curious to see where it goes.
Fun fact, you can still shoot on the speeder once you fill your adrenaline by driving a bit crazy, then you do a red dead slow down, target selection style shooting.
It’s around Kay, who is a scoundrel , not a bounty hunter. VERY different.
Yes, the extremely subjective and biased findings look good. Which in science means nothing.
A 20% tariff on imported goods?
More tax breaks for the rich?
Come on man. Harris is against those.
So being for a tax break for the rich is wrong. And being against a tax break for the rich is wrong? What other option even is there?