• 0 Posts
  • 127 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: December 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • Because all in one distros have mistakes or bugs, for which fixes are only available in the next release 6-12 months later.

    Other times, I know exactly what the problem is and how to fix it, but due to the vendors shenanigans (Ubuntu) it’s ironically much harder to fix. Adding extra repos via ppas and managing them is harder than just pulling it from AUR.

    Having problems due to a vendor’s mistake and being unable to fix them was exactly why I wanted to move away from Windows and macOS. All in one distros kind of fail at addressing that. Arch is basically “fuck it, I’ll compile it myself”





  • Any kind of carbon neutral scenario will almost definitely require carbon capture, simply because many processes are extremely difficult to decarbonise, e.g. heavy industry such as cement and steel manufacturing. Even beyond niche industries, fossil fuels still remain a crucial input to so many things; oil for example is required for aviation, road bitumen, and polymers in plastics, resins, and fibers.

    As despicable as the petro giants are, the extremely high energy capacity of fossils fuels and their use as raw materials means that replacing entirely them with renewables is unviable for neutrality.



  • That’s the neat part, you can’t, because the companies that run ad networks (e.g. Google and Meta) intentionally make the consumer behaviours market as opaque as possible. As the market maker, they have an economic incentive to withold information from their customers, because any mistakes from market participants due to information assymetries directly translate to profit surplus for the market maker.

    We have long since moved on from simple pay per click/view pricing models to pay per “impression,” the definition of which is not clear even to the companies that purchase the ads.

    And in a somewhat ironic twist, one of the motivations for such extensive surveillance is the desire to quantify such ROIs. Statistics and analytics such as click through and conversion rates all require tracking user behaviour across vast networks.



  • Also not as disparate as memes would have you believe, depending on how you look at it.

    The Tokyo Metro Area is very dense at 38 million / 13,000km2, compared to the London Metro Area’s 15 million / 9000km2. But the density of Tokyo rapidly decreases as you go further out, even with the Metro Area.

    Even agglomerating up to the entire Kanto Region only gets around 42 million / 32,000km2. London + East + South East Regions gets you 31 million / 50,000km2.

    I don’t think comparing comparing Regions is very useful, but this only yields that Kanto is approximately twice as dense as London + surroundings. National level figures have Japan at 330/km2, Vs UK’s 285/km2.

    A much more suitable comparison would be the central areas of Tokyo and London, which are the 9 special wards in/around the Yamanote Loop and Inner London (roughly zone 2). This is around 2.2mil / 140km2 or around 15,000/km2 for Tokyo Vs 3.4mil / 320km2 or around 11,000/km2 for London. Again, not nearly the massive discrepancy suggested by memes.

    Apologies if my tone is pointed - having lived and commuted in both cities the way the internet thinks of Japan really bothers me. I do think Tokyo is worse for crowdedness, but honestly not by much, especially when London tube lines can be so long they go outside the station.

    If you repeat the exercise and focus only on central areas, you will find that most major cities actually have very similar densities.


  • Meron35@lemmy.worldtoFunny@sh.itjust.worksThought Experiment
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    That’s entire fucking Kanto Region (32,000km2), which is even larger than the Kanto basin (17,000km2), not the Greater Tokyo Area (13,500km2).

    Most of the Greater Tokyo Area is farmland already. The Kanto Region is a further agglomeration of seven prefectures.

    A better comparison with the UK would be Greater Tokyo Area (13,5000km2) Vs London Metropolitan Area (9000km2, mostly limited by its greenbelt).

    If you insist on comparing Regions, then the Kanto Region should be compared with London + East of England + South East, for a total of around 50,000km2 (UK keeps London as it’s own region).