My wife managed to get an appointment for an MRI on Saturday morning, so we’ll be driving into the city for that on Valentine’s Day.
She’ll be in there, and I’ll be sitting in the car with the service-dog-in-training, Leo. Someday I would expect him to go in with her, but he’s not ready yet.
Then we’ll come home and she’ll fall asleep while I watch movies.
I disagree.
If I recall correctly, it is referred to as the Title when submitting the post, so it’s not unreasonable for someone to treat it like a title.
Edit: However, the post is baiting nonsense.
She’s just very young in the other picture. It’s from the second episode of the first season, “Deep Throat”
For anyone who has to go in to work and suffer without a bidet, I find this worked well:
What do you mean?
For some reason the FBI lets him spend all his time doing that. (Kind of nepotism maybe?)
Nepotism definitely I thought. Wasn’t it established eventually that he was really the cigarette smoking man’s son? Or am I remembering a plot line that turned out to be another false lead?
I thought that’s who was protecting Him. Hindering his work certainly, and telling his co-conspirators that he was controlling him, but also manipulating them to keep him safe.
That’s why I drink Pepsi!
Second picture: the view the ER doctor gets when the ice dildo won’t come out.
It does not make any sense for me anyway to censor TikTok.
Tiktok makes money from ads, so they censor content to conform to what their customers want their ads associated with.
Coke* doesn’t want their ad associated with a naked person demonstrating the latest in dildo technology.
The censorship is not to protect the children. Tiktok doesn’t give any more of a shit about kids than any other company. It’s to protect their revenue.
* I don’t know if Coke advertises on Tiktok. They’re just the first brand I thought of who would probably object to the pairing.
The best and brightest don’t work there anymore.
Apparently nothing.
You had kilhobbyte right there…
I think the point is that the two parties have both moved right to the point where they have become one right wing party.
I don’t think that’s really the case.
I think we have one far right party that is willing to break any law and kill any person for power, and we have another party that is secretly willing to let it happen as long as it means they can pretend to be against it to get donor money.
The Democrats of today are the same as the Republicans of my youth. The Republicans of today are the same as the KKK and Neonazis of my youth.
It’s a hell hole.
Because the police aren’t the slaves, they’re the overseers.
I keep getting left off jury duty by honestly answering the question about whether I would give less weight to a cops testimony because they’re a cop.
I suppose if there’s ever a civil jury trial that doesn’t involve a police testimony, I might serve in a jury.
A bit of a shame because I don’t mind being on a jury. I’m not trying to get out of it. I’m just being honest.
It’s 42 U.S.C. § 3604
Apartments would be included, hotels probably not.
As I understand it, it’s the “B” part of this:
(3)For purposes of this subsection, discrimination includes—
(A)a refusal to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises except that, in the case of a rental, the landlord may where it is reasonable to do so condition permission for a modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.[2]
(B)a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling; or
Allowing a emotional support animal is seen as a reasonable accommodation.
Hotels and motels, if they offer long term housing would be included, but short term housing would not be. Apparently courts have ruled that it applies to homeless shelters. However, the people running them can require documentation, and it is probably difficult for a homeless person to get paperwork from a doctor to prove that they need the accommodation of an emotional support animal.
This is different from a service dog, where the animal is more or less considered part of the person, so denying the animal access is the same as denying the person access due to their disability, and that will incur the wrath of the ADA.
Edit: To be clear, they’re allowed to have a rule that says no pets allowed, but they’re required to make an accommodation for people whose disability requires them to have an emotional support animal. However, they’re not required to tell you that they’re required to make the accommodation.
My daughter got an emotional support animal before she went to college.
She graduated from high school in the middle of the pandemic, and she wasn’t sure she’d be able to make it through college, but she found out that if she had an emotional support animal, she could have it with her in the dorm.
She spoke to her doctor, got the forms, and we found a guinea pig at a shelter.
Normally a guinea pig needs other guinea pigs around to be healthy and safe. Her guinea pig was surrendered from a home that had 30 guinea pigs and he was severely abused by his siblings. His ears were torn, and he’s got scars on his belly. He didn’t tolerate the presence of other guinea pigs.
There was a day before she left for college when my daughter was depressed and just spending all day in bed. I pointed out to her that she was responsible for the guinea pig. She could be depressed, and unmotivated, but she had to clean his pen every day, feed him, and take care of him.
It worked. She graduated in January. He’s her emotional support animal, and she’s his emotional support human. She’s his herd, so she has to keep him company. Obviously, there’s more going on there, but I’m just taking about the emotional support animal.
He’s actually gotten better too. He still doesn’t live with other guinea pigs, but he doesn’t run away if he hears them anymore.
The only legal benefit to having an emotional support animal that I’m aware of in the U.S. is you can’t be denied housing.
They don’t like that. Whoever scatters then might win a lifetime ban.