Nintendo: Can we sue them over the designs?
Lawyer: Not really, this shit is impossible to prove
…
Lawyer: But we can sue them anyway
he/they
Nintendo: Can we sue them over the designs?
Lawyer: Not really, this shit is impossible to prove
…
Lawyer: But we can sue them anyway
Unsurprising. Flew a little too close to the sun there fellas.
Specially Witcher 3
That is the logical way to classify them.
Of course, the industry has been calling ports remasters for a while because it sounds like they did more work that way.
Also most quests are just “talk to npc, use Batman Vision to follow a trail, kill enemy, return”
We call it three stooges syndrome
Did they style their firm’s logo after those “look I’m a fan of a thing” t-shirts
Then you have Dan Shneider
Bro ate copper, tin, and a smelting kit
I wonder how much of that is marketing. That eats up most of a AAA game budget and I don’t think it was heavily advertised outside of China (where it had a big marketing campaign)
How much did those miHoYo games cost to make?
Hmm monke
Nah it was about feature phones. Cool phone though, I’m glad phone manufacturers realized the Game Boy Advance SP’s design is perfect
Even kind old man Jimmy Carter supported ethnic cleansing of 500k-1m people in Indonesia because it was commies being massacred
The people yearn for flip phones
Imagine thinking Reagan doesn’t go in the middle and that Bush isn’t a war criminal
Why would you ruin a perfectly good pineapple by putting it on pizza when you can ruin it by shoving it up your ass
Were this to happen with games with an actual aesthetic that actually tried to do their own thing (like, say, Casette Beasts), I’d be upset.
PocketPair though? If they die, they die. They clearly have a pattern of profitting off of other people’s work, just look at their totally not Hollow Knight game
People are treating them like the underdog fighting for the little guy against the scumbag corporations. They’re both scumbag corporations.
PS: Play Casette Beasts. And Monster Sanctuary.