• 3 Posts
  • 431 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 23rd, 2024

help-circle





  • it’s not a mind game dude.

    the people you think as evil, don’t think they are evil. they think they are good and you are evil.

    if you get away from the stupid bilary of ‘good/evil’ you might better understand that life is more about what goals other people want and what they are willing to do to accomplish them.

    You think Trump is evil probably, but for those that support him he is doing justice and truth to the world and fighting for good, because it’s the leftist/liberal forces that are causing evil.

    the funny thing about life is most people think you are good… until you disagree with them or try to get in the way of their goals. Then you are evil.




  • amen.

    most people don’t get that thinking is a painful process. just like physical exercise.

    and hence why most people desperately avoid it at all costs. most human beings aren’t willing to train for a marathon anymore than they are to become expert thinkers.

    but they live with a lot of false delusion that they are really good at running/thinking, when they aren’t.

    FYI this is also backed up by science. thinking requires more energy and is unpleasant.

    not thinking ist pleasant and comforting and our brains very much prefer it, just our bodies prefer being lazy and fat.



  • who determines what helps people and harms them?

    them, or you?

    because a lot of ‘help’ actually does harm. and vice versa

    what if helping another person comes at harm to you? there is a reason bystanders are not suppose to run into burning buildings or saving drowning people… because the most likely outcome is they themselves will also burn/drown. professionals who are trained to rescue people are a different story.





  • You completely miss my point. It’s not a fallacy if you don’t agree it’s a fallacy.

    There is no universal set of rules for argumentation. They are agreements of convention that are context dependent.

    Like in philosophy we don’t accept arguments from authority/precendent. But in law argument from authority/precedent is completely valid. It’s almost as if different disciplines have different rules.

    But hey, if you want to go try to score points in football by throwing the ball in a basket, and telling everyone else they are fucking idiots for not having a basket on the football pitch… good luck with that.

    it’s only a ‘fallacy’ if all participants agree to the rules that declare it as such.





  • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.worldtoxkcd@lemmy.worldxkcd #3167: Car Size
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    the average carpayment is 750 new, 500 used. I bought a new car last year and my payment is $300. technically i could afford like a $1000 payment.

    americans often pay like 30%+ of their income to cars. And yes, they actively choose to do this. Nobody is forcing them to buy a 60K F150 over a 30K sedan.