Oh, sorry, clearly it’s SUPER different than saying (go on shoot yourself)

I seriously don’t understand how people are this stupid.

Removed by mod

Wow, really? You’re just going to literally tell someone to go kill themselves because they don’t want to live by your grocery store line etiquette?

Yeah, that’s not fucked up or anything…

Yikes.

Removed by mod

I’m sorry, I fail to see how this reads as anything other than “Amanda” being an insanely self-important cunt…

So, if you “support this” feel free to assume that extends to you as well

lyk dis if u cry everytim

“Hit me (with the invisible hand of the free market) baby, one more time!”

• some dude named Adam Smith (generic af ikr?), probably

Do keep in mind, though: If you’re up for more than 4 hours, you should consult a physician… Or, in your case, an IT Specialist, I guess?

Look, I hate to have to be the one to break it to you, but ChatGPT doesn’t really look up to you, it’s just pretending

Is that the same AI vending machine that attempted to alert company security (i think) when told it was going to be taken offline and also tried to set up physical meetings with people, even describing its outfit? Or am I thinking of another?

All the creepy surrealistic AI stuff starts to run together for me after awhile lol

Based on your first couple of sentences, I feel like you don’t understand what the concept of the government possessing the monopoly on violence means… Like, in terms of that role socially (as in, for society) itself, or in practical terms. I’m particularly confused by you seeming to assert that technological advancement somehow had altered/was altering this… Governments have used - and I’m sure will continue to use - all of the things you mentioned and a great many more to maintain their monopoly of violence. It isn’t an actual office somewhere or anything technology can necessarily supplant, it’s more of a social construct/contract

Isn’t that arguably only because modern governments maintain a “monopoly on violence,” essentially?

Can we arrange to have their parents come in and ask them what they’d do if they were ordered to jump off a bridge?

Ya know, just in a little extra bit of effort to kinda hammer the point home?

Well, maybe not their parents (cuz they’re probably racist pieces of shit too), but like… Like Tom Hanks, maybe? He seems like he could properly portray the level of “I’m not even mad at you, I’m just disappointed, son” this requires.

Oh, us poor unfortunate souls

Hopefully, at some point, things will stop happening so we can finally reach a consensus on some stuff…

I’m a bit confused here, not gonna lie - partially by the fact that this has apparently come up enough for you to necessitate a “conventional way” to phrase it, but mostly due to that phrase inexplicably being one of the creepiest sentences I’ve ever goddamn read lol

That’s something I would expect to see on like a list of serial killer pick up lines or one of the last outputs from an insane, rogue AI as it launches all our nukes at each other or something

What if this is the right answer tho, in a roundabout sorta way… It would seem somehow fitting for OP’s scenario to result in some sort of registration request, wouldn’t it? 🤣😂

Are you asking how/what is percievable prior to a locus of such perception existing? If so, just as a fun bonus question: which of us do you think is higher - you for asking, or me for attempting to answer? 🙃😁

People be like: “Just try to think of the last time you were happy and…”

And I’m just over here thinking: “I remember being happy once… It was 1996. I was nine.”

Pff, whatever man… Schumer got them to strike the name off of the one big abominable bill!

That totally more than makes up for their seeming refusal to do anything about his attempted coup!