If a man speaks his mind but has no youtube channel, is he really misogynistic?
Tune in next week to bad philosophy, where we will conduct a survey among railway workers about pulling levers and a special guest will shows us how to stop bullets with math.

While your partner can’t be found by it, they can be approximated to an arbitrary degree of precision.

Because an immortal is likely to have formed connections with mortals that died of cancer. Als, if their friends live longer, they need to start from scratch less often. Another way to archive that is to befriend a family for generations.

AARRRRG, that one hurt.
Enriching is about isotopes of the same element.
You know elements? The things that have the same chemical property?

The whole challenge of enrichment is that you want to separate atoms by mass alone, and the difference is <2%. Nobody would build many expensive centrifuges if there was another way.

Lure the bugs to your screen and catch them or let them hide in the shade. That’s the choice.

I don’t see how willpower brings down rent, but I agree on the first 80%.

The default configuration in 2017 was public write access, but those databases where taken over long ago.

Getting there over Christmas is impressive.

I don’t believe you could save the emissions from animal agriculture.

The easiest is to stop converting more land to animals use.

Most animal ag is on land that isn’t suitable for growing crops,

But 6% of global emissions are from feeding crops to animals.

if it was ended, the land would become useless

Aside from reducing our emissions by 16%, meaning it would be about as useful as removing all emissions from the transport sector.

and left to go wild where it would support just as many just as polluting animals,

Laughable, but if if it where true it could easily be solved with reintroducing predators and rewilding the artificial grass lands.

but with no possibility of treating the pollution problem as no one would be managing the wild animals

What is more polluting? Animals shiting in the forrest every day at a different place or month worth of stored manure deposited on one field in a day, with barely any plant at the moment? Which of those will naturally break down and which will be washed into the ground water?

Where are the huge amounts of biomass fermenting into methane? Some swamps and every farm.

Rust doesn’t have a scheduler.
The issue is the false assumption, that the remove operation can safely be done without taking a lock. This can be done in some specific data structures using atomic operations, but here the solution was to just take the lock. The same thing could have happened in a C code base but without the unsafe block indicating where to look for the bug.

I had the same question a few hours ago, but I found some science.
Tldr: 30% of energy use is in diesel, and about half of that is for tilling fields.

Rant:
Note that this is energy use, so only CO2 emissions are counted, while methan is ignored. If we stopped farming animals, the effective emissions of the sector would be cut in half. Even if we are unwilling to change out diet, maybe we should look at reducing the amount of fertilizer instead.

The main problem is that, not ploughing increases the need for pesticides, currently around 8% of energy used and reduces yield. While not ploughing increasing requiring 3x the pesticides might not be the case, a 20% reduction in yield seems plausible.

The main energy consumption in farming is fertilizer at around 50%, but more importantly half the emissions are related to animal agriculture. Cutting back on that would actually make a difference.

The commenter must believe forks are magic.

and like half the [rust] devs left for Crab.

Crablang is a joke fork to make fun of a trademark screw up by the rust foundation.

Exactly, you never know when you want to change the base for printing out from under someone.

What unholy mix of languages is that? It is dominated by a blend of javascript and python, but with notes of something exotic. Maybe algol? or vhdl?, there is to little to tell.
Impressive, someone write up a spec and publish it to the esolang wiki.

The code seems to be C-style language with curly braces and types in front for variable declarations, probably java. This means the variable must be declared of screen before the loop or it would not compile. It could have a previous value or be uninitialized, but that does not affect the end result.

Segmentation fault, you forgot to take the reference and derefenced a null pointer.

Because the only brainfuck instructions in your comment where a - which decrements and 20 +, each of which increments.
Mine echos the first two characters from stdin, because of the commas and dots.

Spotify suck at programming. When using the app offline, I can view and play songs and podcasts directly or from the queue, but the menu to add stuff to the queue doesn’t load.

No self respecting linux vegan would proselytizes for Bitcoin. They might begrudgingly use them for their original purpose, but if asked about electronic payment, they talk about gnu taler.