Rust doesn’t have a scheduler.
The issue is the false assumption, that the remove operation can safely be done without taking a lock. This can be done in some specific data structures using atomic operations, but here the solution was to just take the lock. The same thing could have happened in a C code base but without the unsafe block indicating where to look for the bug.

I had the same question a few hours ago, but I found some science.
Tldr: 30% of energy use is in diesel, and about half of that is for tilling fields.

Rant:
Note that this is energy use, so only CO2 emissions are counted, while methan is ignored. If we stopped farming animals, the effective emissions of the sector would be cut in half. Even if we are unwilling to change out diet, maybe we should look at reducing the amount of fertilizer instead.

The main problem is that, not ploughing increases the need for pesticides, currently around 8% of energy used and reduces yield. While not ploughing increasing requiring 3x the pesticides might not be the case, a 20% reduction in yield seems plausible.

The main energy consumption in farming is fertilizer at around 50%, but more importantly half the emissions are related to animal agriculture. Cutting back on that would actually make a difference.

The commenter must believe forks are magic.

and like half the [rust] devs left for Crab.

Crablang is a joke fork to make fun of a trademark screw up by the rust foundation.

Exactly, you never know when you want to change the base for printing out from under someone.

What unholy mix of languages is that? It is dominated by a blend of javascript and python, but with notes of something exotic. Maybe algol? or vhdl?, there is to little to tell.
Impressive, someone write up a spec and publish it to the esolang wiki.

The code seems to be C-style language with curly braces and types in front for variable declarations, probably java. This means the variable must be declared of screen before the loop or it would not compile. It could have a previous value or be uninitialized, but that does not affect the end result.

Segmentation fault, you forgot to take the reference and derefenced a null pointer.

Because the only brainfuck instructions in your comment where a - which decrements and 20 +, each of which increments.
Mine echos the first two characters from stdin, because of the commas and dots.

Spotify suck at programming. When using the app offline, I can view and play songs and podcasts directly or from the queue, but the menu to add stuff to the queue doesn’t load.

No self respecting linux vegan would proselytizes for Bitcoin. They might begrudgingly use them for their original purpose, but if asked about electronic payment, they talk about gnu taler.

The main problem with that is the large power consumption by industry. This is ensuring continued profits for the company and thereby weakens your influence, similar to hiring scabs.

It was interesting, but why are we reheating news from 2023 every few month?

But they grow of air and water without significantly consuming the earth they grow in.

Nowadays he probably just arranges electrons.

You should take it as a professional drug.

Mostly a great comment, but I wouldn’t compare unit to null, it’s more like the void type.

It’s not.
I usually go into zapper mode on ublock to remove the pop up without agreeing, but they probably treat that as “accept and continue”.

Then rust has ||{}

Sadly we can’t add more complexity without adding an argument: |_:&'_[()]|{}

It’s a tumbler thing, iirc it’s the only way to add your own text when reposting.