

No, it isn’t. It’s a fancy next word generator. It knows nothing, can verify nothing, shouldn’t be used as a source for anything. It is a text generator that sounds confident and mostly human and that is it.
No, it isn’t. It’s a fancy next word generator. It knows nothing, can verify nothing, shouldn’t be used as a source for anything. It is a text generator that sounds confident and mostly human and that is it.
We actually haven’t found a universal packing algorithm, so it’s on a case-by-case basis. This is the best we’ve found so far for this case (17 squares in a square).
What’s a bison molar doing in a creek in Germany?
The poor pay the largest portion of their wages in taxes. They also benefit society far beyond any other social group. It’s the wealthy that take the most from the rest of us and pay almost nothing back.
Corporal punishment
https://www.azuradeluxe.com/en based on the name of the hotel… I’m guessing it’s referencing TES
I can knock out Fun with Dick and Jane in 30 minutes flat. So, extrapolate as you will from there. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Why are there pipes (“|”) in the text? It’s throwing me
Is it not a known issue that photos in posts have bad resolution? It’s always been an issue.
Now you killed it while lurching forward! Exciting!
While learning, don’t touch the gas. Learn how to take the car out of neutral and into first using only the clutch. Then the whole process makes a lot more sense for when you need to do it faster.
Have you considered the profit margins on black sludge? Why won’t these peons ever think of the shareholders?! /s
You should always use /s when you’re sarcastically being a monster. Don’t give the monsters any space to occupy
Three movies in a trench coat? Hell yeah, brother
Not well. That’s why most of its ancestors have fins nowadays
I have a username. That’s all the identifying I need. Why do you feel the need to twitterfy lemmy?
Yeah, the limit before paying is so high, you’re fine as long as you’ve not got a whole household on the thing
Homie? Isn’t it just that he lied cause he ain’t no narc?
That… no… but…
The argument that “you can’t split infinitives”, as I’ve heard it, is because you can’t split infinitives in Latin (since the “to” is a part of the verb itself). This might be fallacious (a straw man) according to Wikipedia, but I’m fine with that. People split infinitives and I’ve never seen a strong argument as to why that’s wrong.
This shit ain’t Latin. English splits infinitives.
Am dispensary now.
Source: farms