

test: assert I before II
good to go


test: assert I before II
good to go
it is an exothermic reaction, it releases money


anything is preferable to people like you
Guy thinks being the CEO of a company that does research is the same thing as doing the research itself. He is not even the last corresponding author (that is where PIs in natural sciences almost always put their names), he had to put him self as both the first author and the corresponding author. It must suck to work for him.


this startup’s CEO and finding members should be trialed for crimes against humanity


All this you listed is the reason why we are fucked if we keep depending more and more on “this” AI and don’t get a revolution in the AI field to replace the current one with AGI. Because in ten years we risk losing a big chunk of expertise and if we don’t have an AI that can really replace the current one with something that can actually replace experts then there will huge infrastructure problems across multiple industries.


test in production taken to whole another level


“Space billionaires”

well enough to fool me and feast on my body as it seems
“I have nothing to hide” is as only as good as what the government thinks is illegal. And that may be far from reasonable and can change very quickly, just look at US or UK.


An ex-Intel CEO’s mission to build a Christian AI: ‘hasten the coming of Christ’s return
An ex-intel CEO’s idea to make money by combining two money making tools


Ph’nglui mglw’nafh Cthulhu R’lyeh wgah’nagl fhtagn


ahh actions which would be considered “hackers stealing your personal info” twenty years ago is now something people (including me) pay money to be subjected to.


Microsoft declined to comment
Microsoft was completely OK with this
“Not shark just floor mouth, promise. Can take the shortcut.”


eh perhaps to collect usage data and somehow benefit from it.
test in production:
welp turns out it actually works fine, suck it losers