You must log in or register to comment.
It’s not evolving backwards. It’s being carefully crafted to turn into exactly what corporations wanted from the beginning but couldn’t do due to technical and legal limitations.
So is my edc to match it lmao.
Phones are locking down and getting harder to get rom and root support and a lot of projects are either giving up or dying.
Welp! Back to the laptop I go! Been carrying it with me everywhere just like I did before I got a smartphone. The only duties my phone needs to do is make calls, answer SMS and RCS and tether.
Could’ve said a version of this about every multi-function pocketable device ever made, but they’re still fun
Maybe we’ve been pushing way too hard, way too fast into the age of technology being integrated into our every waking moment, bros.
I’m ready to go back to like an iPhone 5 level of technology and Windows 7. Just wish it was realistic.
The word you’re looking for is “devolving”.
That would make sense if evolution had a direction. But evolution can favor less complexity just as well as more: it depends on the selective pressures it’s under. “Fittest” is not necessarily “best.”
This applies metaphorically to marketed products as well as literally to biologiccal systems. It’s not inevitable that the marketplace will deliver progress. You might never get that invisible handjob.
No devolving makes sense. The natural pressures are causing the user interface to be worse.
I prefer “enshitification”
Evolving backwards would be returning to ergonomic UIs with clear HIG being followed, having a scriptable variant for every class of applications, and any piece of software, OS UI included, not acting as an advert. Contrasts and colors and bright pictures are not what I need to see while working. It’s as if your screwdriver was built in the form of an alien fish dildo, and had a chain of ringing bells. Why is this bullshit considered normal and usual with computer interfaces, I dunno.
And a company’s website is its interface to the world, for the user. Not its advert. They’ve already seen the advert or don’t need it if they are on that website! They want to actually use it.
an alien fish dildo
That sounds intriguing.
I think you’ll find that, sadly, nobody is worse for HIG than software engineers, especially Linux aficionados.
They like their design as unpalatable and shit-lookalike as possible.
the irony is that title was probably AI generated.
He admitted that he had to use AI a little bit after a somewhat broken finger.
Doubt. If I can type with one hand while chatting with those hot women in my area, this guy can type with nine fingers.
What? He kinda broke a finger and then suddenly needed to use AI? His one bad finger prevented him using the other 9? He couldn’t speech-to-text it?
Or did AI break his finger to get him to make the video?!
There is a video for you to watch and get the context.
I’m not clicking on what looks like an AI slop YouTube video just to find out why a guy making a video about AI needed to use AI to make the video. Beyond seeing clippy for nostalgia, seeing that it’s likely a video about MS I care even less.
If you actually thought it was a video of value, you could have written (or just copy/pasta) a description of the video and why it might be of interest.
I’m not your AI assistant.
It’s a reference to “it is evolving, just backwards”
It’s simple - if your product or platform uses dark patterns, I will not use it. I will even use an inferior platform or product in order to be free to choose how I use my software.
What do you mean by dark patterns?
Design that is in the interest of someone other than the user, intended to coerce or trick the user into behaviors that benefit that non-user at the user’s expense.
Examples:
- Microtransactions instead of asking for the price up-front
- Using gambling mechanics in non-gambling games (e.g. loot boxes)
- Eliminating potential stopping points in the user interaction, like e.g. endless scrolling instead of pagination
- Using big, visually engaging buttons for the actions they want the user to perform (“Accept tracking”) while using tiny, grey links for the actions they don’t want the user to perform (“Reject tracking”), or even worse, hiding the action they don’t want the user to perform behind multiple menues.
- Using wording that creates fear or other negative emotions to stop users from performing such actions (“If you cancel your subscription now, you will lose access to this, this, and that. Everything you did will be lost. Do you really want to do that?”)
- Disguising ads and other non-organic content as organic content. (“I found this product and it cured my hair loss, my potency issues and made me rich at the same time! ~sponsored ad~”)
- Disguising ads as notifications
- Disguising ads as the download button
- Agreeing to do one simple action contains a hidden agreement to a ton of other things
And many more things like that.
I will, if I have no other option. Say, finding a working VPN service in Russia … sucks (mostly banned). I think I’ll end up with a VDS and an https tunnel.
Slava Ukraini
No, I can’t rent a Ukrainian VDS, it might even get me to jail.
But in general, I hope your leadership’s assholes fester and they die in horrible pain
That’s too easy.
Agreed
You forgot the second part. And a flashy salute to go with it.
“Looks like you’re trying to be productive. Let me correct that for you”
Clippy didn’t hallucinate. I think Clippy wins
“Looks like you’re writing a letter”
No I’m not, fuck off Clippy.
Turns out we just hadn’t coined the term for computer intelligence being wrong as hallucinating yet.
You know what, I think I remember that. You’re right. My bad
Clippy still wins though because you could have him duck off.
And he had bespoke animations that were kinda charming
and you could change him into something else. links the cat was mine.
I think the cat used to be all over XP.
deleted by creator
The concept of a desktop assistant has always been there.
And it’s always been trash. That’s how you know it will always be there in the future too.
It depends. A chatbot is kinda gimmicky, I agree. But stuff like ocr, reverse image seach from current screen, voice to text and probably more can be nicely combined into one assistant app. Google assistant used to come close to that, so did the old Cortana (although not quite as versatile). They didn’t reinvent the wheel but they were genuinely convenient.
Exemplified by this being a rant in a video with sponsorships tacked on the description and comments. Probably in the video too, but obviously I’m not going to watch it.
