It gave hapiness, that’s the point.

Waterfox has been pretty good lately

Chatbots often read as neurodivergent because they usually model one of our common constructed personalities: the faithful and professional helper that charms adults with their giftedness. Anything adults experienced was fascinating because it was an alien world that’s more logical than the world of kids that were our age, so we would enthusiastically chat with adults about subjects we’ve memorized but don’t yet understand, like science and technology.

Since recursion in humans has no commonly understood definition, Geoff and ChatGPT are each working off of diverging understandings. If users don’t validate definitions, getting abstract with a chatbot would lead to conceptual breakdown… that does not sound fun to experience.

You might be reading a lot into vague, highly conceptual, highly abstract language, but your conclusion is worth brainstorming about.

Personally, I think Geoff Lewis just discovered that people are starting to distrust him and others, and he used ChatGPT to construct an academic thesis that technically describes this new concept called “distrust,” void of accountability on his end.

“Why are people acting this way towords me? I know they can’t possibly distrust me without being manipulated!”

No wonder AI can replace middle-management…

And he had bespoke animations that were kinda charming

Beard looks good on him

I worked with an AS400 while in vehicle logistics, those things are optimized for simple functions but high data throughput

If that dude got proper support, he could have done wonders; he made animated icons for his 16-color assembly-coded OS, and a simple 3d racer! All by himself!

There’s a Fairly Odd Parents episode where Timmy wishes for this, and his asshole neighbors still found themselves to be the best of the grey blobs

I’m guessing OP means the build quality, as defined by the mechanical and material standards that are needed to recreate the keyboard.

Oh haha cause it wouldn’t be recorded

“We have our heading” “Here we goooooooo!”

I know little German, and even I know what the punchline is (source: bassist)

It’s even crueler when you remember that newly freed slaves grew the watermelon themselves because they couldn’t afford much. Pumpkin spice is a choice of novelty, not survival.

I would like to know more

People were also a lot more open to their data being used by machine learning because it was used in universally appreciable tasks like image classification or image upscaling; tasks no human would want to do manually and which threatens nobody.

The difference today is not the data used, but the threat from the use-case. Or, more accurately, people don’t mind their data being used if they know the outcome is of universal benefit.

The issue isn’t the final, individual art pieces, it’s the scale. An AI can produce sub-par art quickly enough to threaten the livelyhood of artists, especially now that there is far too much art for anyone to consume and appreciate. AI art can win attention via spam, drowning out human artists.

The passion… The passion… Is more than i can withstand!

21 is very specific