And he had bespoke animations that were kinda charming

Beard looks good on him

I worked with an AS400 while in vehicle logistics, those things are optimized for simple functions but high data throughput

If that dude got proper support, he could have done wonders; he made animated icons for his 16-color assembly-coded OS, and a simple 3d racer! All by himself!

There’s a Fairly Odd Parents episode where Timmy wishes for this, and his asshole neighbors still found themselves to be the best of the grey blobs

I’m guessing OP means the build quality, as defined by the mechanical and material standards that are needed to recreate the keyboard.

Oh haha cause it wouldn’t be recorded

“We have our heading” “Here we goooooooo!”

I know little German, and even I know what the punchline is (source: bassist)

It’s even crueler when you remember that newly freed slaves grew the watermelon themselves because they couldn’t afford much. Pumpkin spice is a choice of novelty, not survival.

I would like to know more

People were also a lot more open to their data being used by machine learning because it was used in universally appreciable tasks like image classification or image upscaling; tasks no human would want to do manually and which threatens nobody.

The difference today is not the data used, but the threat from the use-case. Or, more accurately, people don’t mind their data being used if they know the outcome is of universal benefit.

The issue isn’t the final, individual art pieces, it’s the scale. An AI can produce sub-par art quickly enough to threaten the livelyhood of artists, especially now that there is far too much art for anyone to consume and appreciate. AI art can win attention via spam, drowning out human artists.

The passion… The passion… Is more than i can withstand!

21 is very specific

Exactly!!! If we’re already assuming they served in the military, why do we need any more information than their name? What is the end goal of the dox?

My apologies, I did not read the article on the assumption Meta would choose the irresponsible option. The article was surprisingly nuanced, and I hope the enforcement of Meta’s policies are equally nuanced.

Isn’t it incredibly dangerous to ban “Zionist” only because it’s misused? It can be used to legitimately describe people who have a vested interest in Isreal occupying Palestine. I understand it’s used as a slur, but banning otherwise normal words will make the discourse much more difficult.

Still use it for my OG Xbox

It’s kind of adorable, like a child designing an album cover using concepts they recognize but don’t understand