I’ve used GIMP for decades and it’s never crashed on me. Krita and Inkscape are also great imo. I’ve used photoshop. It’s fine. I really think issues with the UI are mostly just an issue of what you’re used to. I see exactly the same thing with people switching to Blender or Vi uses trying to use any otherr editor in the world

Nope. We have introduced bees and bumblebees as well and they’re fine.

Opposing Genocide is not supporting terrorism… You can think Hamas is bad AND Genocide, also. I’m sorry that you find this complex

And thus. Again, piracy seems to be the moral choice

European Wasps are an invasive species where I live and they’re fucking up a lot of the local flora and fauna. Also “wasps” is a huge group of species and they’re hard to generalise about

I’ve never really gotten into it. Might try again

The internet

Your comprehension issues are a you problem

Like, obviously?

Reprocessing reduces waste but it does not eliminate it. Its like saying that curb side plastics recycling has solved the microplastics issue

As someone with a degree in Philosophy, I don’t think this is really a philosophical question. The science is interesting and useful to know

I’m on win10. I use win11 at work and I’m fine with it but there’s no way in hell recall is going on my home machine and equally no way in hell I’m getting a computer just to get win 11. Im fine using Linux. I will definitely do that before put with with this bs

Math and science all have a philosophical core, it’s just that most of the time you don’t need to question it, so it’s easy to forget about it. Which is fine

deleted by creator

Agreed. They’ve been making shit games with great production values. I think they’d be better making animated films than games

Yeah agree with you about indie games. Still some genuine passion there

Similar thing happened to the games industry as well, I think. Initially it was creative people and engineers who were focused on what they were making. These days the industry is dominated by suits that just want to extract as much cash as possible from players.

It’s especially galling given that the current AI du jour, LLMs, don’t do mutch more than reflect their training data back at us. Which means that if they could answer the problem, it would be because people had already answered the question

I don’t doubt they’ll get faster. What I wonder is whether they’ll ever stop being so inaccurate. I feel like that’s a structural feature of the model.

Agree with that 100 % I have a degree in Philosophy and that’s a reoccurring dynamic I saw with people trying to baffle with bullshit rather than make a cogent argument