Hum… You think I was collecting virus in the system folders?

And Linux could do backups perfectly well back then. I just didn’t have offline backups of the virus, and the online one got erased too. Why would Linux do OS snapshots anyway? It’s not something one would need.

Isn’t the idea just to slowly kill them?

Those things used to circulate so much. I had a collection of computer virus that came by my computer by somebody’s floppy, downloads, etc.

Then, by 2008 I decided to look try one option in an anti-virus software that I didn’t know what it did… it erased the entire collection.

America is a single continent too, or 3 subcontinents if you like to divide things.

(Turns out the OP’s definition is completely wrong, but who cares?)

It’s actually very real machines, doing extremely well controlled chemical reactions, and no AI unless you count all computer software as AI (ok, processors have neural networks controlling them nowadays, so just “normal” amount of AI).

How big is its genome? There isn’t much in a virus.

People can replicate a lot of them from purely data.

Sid likes 3m high tunnels. Make sure to elevate your house’s hoof appropriately.

Keep the virus data in a computer where it can’t escape from.

Looks like you need practice to go together with that theory your brain thinks is useless.

It seems to be in n equinox.

Also, the Sun’s light seems to move in curves. Both North-South and East-West.

The beetles and the bees won’t eat you either. They can harm you in other ways though.

Somebody has to sell it. How do they separate their customers?

Yeah, doesn’t look like APL to me, but I don’t know it well enough to tell for certain.

Either way, that much code in a language that is at least as concise as APL… what is this? a full office suite?

I was talking about real life, but I think factorio calculates damage in more than one physics iteration. If that’s the case, your odds increase a very small bit by going faster, but a bit that is way more significant than the “indistinguishable from zero” you get in real life.

Oh, and just to add, your hits of being hit by a meteor on any single trip reduce the faster you move. But the trains are always out there, so their odds of being hit in a game-play don’t change (or change very little).

It’s non-intuitive, but unless you are running really fast, your speed shouldn’t really change the odds of a meteor hitting you.

Oh, I see.

Good point. I didn’t notice the huge empirical test for it running right now.

Yes, inequality is increasing in the US.

But I don’t really get how that relates. Anyway, may point is that if you bracket the tax at high enough incomes, maybe not even a 99% marginal tax rate will suffice for making rich people move away. Those people are rich, they don’t care about spending some money to live where they want.

The same is not true about the poor, by the way. It’s easy to tax them so much that they leave.

And Laffer focusing his work on the rich was the cheapest and most plain sell-out on the academic history.

The way that theory is framed is the most ridiculous thing in the world. The rich are the least sensitive people to price increases.

When people say they “believe” in science, I think they mean they are putting their faith into the scientists performing the science. That whatever conclusion they come to after an experiment or study is the correct conclusion.

That’s literally what they mean, where “scientists” may as easily mean real scientists as charlatans.

It’s still completely antagonistic to how science is practiced (if scientists behaved like that, they would never learn anything), and something closer to religion than science.

Yeah, let’s pretend the vibe-coder creates praiseworthy code when everything is working…