Hum… Can Glycon help me finish my projects?

Oh, I didn’t know about digraphs at all. C++ is a really big language.

And wow, that’s a well hidden footgun.

What is happening there?

Is it about templates? I can’t find any reference for that syntax.

It seems that you need to get better. There are plenty of valid complaints against SQL, but your problems seem to be all due to lack of familiarity.

No variables, no functions; Oh but you can do a CTE

Yeah, CTEs are more expressive than variables. And as somebody pointed, every database out there supports functions, you may want to look how they work.

UNION ALL, UNION ALL, UNION ALL… “There’s got to be a better way, surely…”

What do you mean by a “better way”? Union all is a perfectly valid operation.

And then you try put a MAX in a where and it won’t let you because you gotta pull all the maxes out in their own query, make a table, join them in, and use them like a filter…

Window functions exist.

You are missing some of the yeast.

The author seems to not know what a bishop hat looks like and why the piece top looks like that. Or just didn’t care about it.

My bet it’s only scary after she had time to move from the “WTF just happened?” phase.

The emails seem to be real. If the people there are telling the truth, it’s your guess.

A <- ox

B <- house

C <- some kind of weapon we don’t even have a name anymore

D <- fish

And so on. This set has been running around for half of the world for thousands of years and yet nobody thinks it’s a problem.

Does it click?

Well, that’s how you do it!

And if two widgets need to create the same effect, you just copy the 5000 lines around. That’s why copy-and-paste was invented.

(It really shouldn’t be necessary… but in case somebody still needs it, here’s the \s)

Once people start to openly justify the bubble by the rationality of the greater fool theory, they tend to pop very quickly.

This time things are different in that there is an actual caste of people with infinite money that can only pop one bubble if they inflate another one (or if the government stops giving them money, but I wouldn’t bet on that). And there doesn’t seem to exist anything big enough to take all that money. So it’s hard to imagine the bubble popping mechanics working here.

I hereby propose we make a workforce to rename all the stuff named after Euler.

It’s just horrible. What’s the difference between Euler’s relation and Euler’s ratio? What about Euler’s rule and Euler’s method? Do all of those only name a single thing? Who knows? Why does Google just replace half of them by their preferred Euler named stuff? Who knows?

Ok… But what time is now?

Oh, that’s right, I was using gcc.

Dude, after forcing -std=c++20, the compiler still can’t find a reference for std::ostream::operator<<(float)…

Do I have to link with some non-standard library? There doesn’t seem to have any numbers.a included with gcc.

By virtue of being math, it has to be mechanism-pure.

That’s what math is all about.

Also, a neural network described mathematically is mechanism-pure.

Well, I can assure you that you have requirements.

You just don’t know what they are.

At least NaNs are different from each other and themselves.

SQL’s null would like a word here.

>> typeof(NaN)
<- "number"

It’s valid for C too, but it will be either a double or a float.